Between coaching youth soccer for 8 years and watching dozens of kids cycle through countless pairs of cleats, equipment failures happen more often than you’d think. Last month, during a particularly muddy practice session, I watched three different kids struggle with cleats that just couldn’t handle the conditions. Mike here, and having seen this scenario play out repeatedly, I was curious when the DREAM PAIRS Boys Girls Soccer Cleats promised “high-grip” performance and “durable protection” at a budget-friendly price point. 6 weeks of testing with multiple youth players later, here’s whether these $45 cleats can actually deliver on their promises.
Technical Specifications
- 💰 Price: $45 ()
- ⚖️ Weight: 8.2 oz (kids size 13)
- 🧪 Sole material: Thermoplastic Elastomers (TPE)
- 👟 Upper material: Suede with synthetic leather accents
- 🔒 Closure: Traditional lace-up system
- ⚽ Category: Youth soccer cleats (unisex)
- 🎯 Best for: Recreational youth soccer, flag football, beginner players
- 💧 Water resistance: Not water resistant
- ⏱️ Testing period: 6 weeks, 18 practices, 8 games across 4 different players
Design, Build Quality & Real-World Performance
Right out of the box, these DREAM PAIRS cleats have that typical budget soccer shoe aesthetic – they’re not going to win any design awards, but they’re functional and kids seem to love the vibrant color options. The royal blue and black combination I tested is eye-catching without being too flashy, and I’ve seen the pink, green, and purple variants on the field – all equally vibrant.
The suede upper feels surprisingly decent for the price point. It’s not premium leather by any stretch, but it’s textured enough to provide reasonable ball control during basic dribbling and passing drills. I watched several 8-12 year olds use these during skills practice, and the material held up to repeated ball contact without showing immediate wear patterns.
The lacing system is straightforward – standard eyelets with decent quality laces that actually stay tied during play. One parent mentioned their kid’s laces came loose frequently with other brands, but these held secure through multiple practices. The fit is where things get interesting, and I’ll address the sizing confusion that’s clearly happening in the reviews.
Cushioning & Support Experience
The EVA insole provides adequate shock absorption for youth players. During testing, I had kids ranging from 6 to 12 years old wear these for full 90-minute practices, and none complained about foot fatigue or discomfort. The mesh lining does help with breathability – I noticed significantly less foot odor compared to some cheaper cleats that trap moisture.
However, let’s be realistic about what you’re getting at this price point. The cushioning isn’t going to compete with premium youth cleats from Nike or Adidas. But for recreational soccer where kids are playing 1-2 times per week, the support level is perfectly adequate.
The ankle area provides minimal support – these are low-cut cleats designed for agility rather than protection. For most youth soccer applications, this is fine, but parents of kids who’ve had ankle issues might want to consider mid-cut alternatives.
On-the-Field Performance
Here’s where things get practical. I tested these cleats across multiple field conditions: freshly cut grass, slightly wet turf, and unfortunately, one very muddy practice after a rainstorm. The TPE sole configuration performed better than expected for the price range.
On dry grass, traction was solid. Kids could make quick cuts and direction changes without slipping. The stud pattern isn’t aggressive, but it’s functional for youth soccer speeds and movements. I watched players sprint, turn, and even slide tackle (when allowed), and the grip held up consistently.
The wet conditions test was more revealing. While these aren’t designed for serious muddy conditions, they maintained reasonable traction on damp grass. I did notice some slippage during sharp cuts when the field was particularly saturated, but that’s honestly expected at this price point.
Ball control feel is adequate for developing players. The suede upper provides enough grip for basic touches, passes, and shots. It’s not the premium leather feel of expensive cleats, but for kids learning fundamental skills, it gets the job done without hindering development.
Meeting Your Youth Soccer Goals – Does It Deliver?
For recreational youth soccer, these cleats absolutely deliver on their core promise. They provide functional traction, adequate comfort, and durability that matches the price point. But let’s talk about the elephant in the room – durability expectations.
Several reviews mentioned construction concerns, and I can confirm that these are budget cleats with budget construction methods. I noticed some glue application around the sole that isn’t perfectly clean, and the overall build quality feels mass-produced rather than precision-crafted.
However, after 6 weeks of regular use across multiple players, none of the pairs showed significant wear or separation issues. For youth cleats that typically get outgrown in 6-12 months anyway, the durability-to-price ratio makes sense.
Key Strengths and Weaknesses
✅ Key Strengths
- Excellent value for money – Hard to beat at $45
- True-to-size fit – Despite review confusion, most kids fit their normal size
- Vibrant color options – Kids love the bright colors
- Decent ball control – Suede upper provides adequate grip
- Comfortable for youth players – EVA insole works well for lighter weights
- Breathable lining – Mesh interior reduces moisture buildup
- Adequate traction – TPE studs grip well on grass surfaces
❌ Areas for Improvement
- Budget construction quality – Visible glue, mass-production feel
- Limited durability – Won’t last multiple seasons of heavy use
- No weather resistance – Struggle in very wet conditions
- Minimal ankle support – Low-cut design offers little protection
- Quality control issues – Some customers received used/dirty pairs
- Basic cushioning – EVA insole is functional but not plush
Performance in Various Soccer Conditions
During my 6-week testing period, I made sure to evaluate these cleats across the conditions most youth players encounter. Here’s what I discovered:
Dry Grass Performance (Rating: 8/10): This is where these cleats shine. On well-maintained grass fields, the traction was consistently reliable. Kids could sprint, cut, and change direction without slippage issues. The stud pattern works well for youth-level speeds and the suede upper provided good ball contact during dribbling drills.
Wet Conditions (Rating: 6/10): Performance drops noticeably on damp or wet grass. While not dangerous, there’s definitely some slippage during aggressive cuts. For light rain games, they’re manageable, but I wouldn’t recommend them for muddy field conditions.
Artificial Turf (Rating: 5/10): These are clearly designed for natural grass. The stud configuration isn’t optimal for turf surfaces, and I noticed some discomfort complaints from kids during turf practices. If your child primarily plays on artificial surfaces, consider turf-specific shoes instead.
Does DREAM PAIRS Deliver on Their Promises?
Let’s examine the key marketing claims against real-world performance:
“High-Grip Cleats with strategically positioned studs”: Partially True – The grip is adequate for youth soccer on grass, but “high-grip” might be overselling. The stud positioning works, but it’s not revolutionary.
“Durable & Protective textured synthetic leather”: Mostly True – The suede upper does enhance ball control and provides reasonable protection. However, “durable” is relative to the price point – these won’t outlast premium cleats.
“Breathable mesh lining prevents moisture buildup”: True – This claim holds up. The mesh lining definitely improves ventilation compared to non-breathable alternatives.
“EVA insole enhances shock absorption and foot support”: True for youth weights – The EVA insole works well for kids weighing 60-120 lbs. Adequate cushioning for the target age group.
My Overall Assessment
Performance Scores (Out of 10)
- Comfort: 7.5/10 – Good for youth players, adequate cushioning
- Traction: 7/10 – Solid on grass, struggles on wet surfaces
- Durability: 6/10 – Budget construction, but lasts through typical youth season
- Ball Control: 7/10 – Suede upper provides decent touch for developing players
- Value for Money: 9/10 – Outstanding value at $45 price point
- Sizing Accuracy: 8/10 – Generally true to size despite review confusion
- Style Appeal: 8/10 – Kids love the vibrant color options
Overall Score: 7.4/10
What Other Youth Soccer Players Are Saying
After analyzing dozens of customer reviews, the consensus is surprisingly positive for a budget cleat. Parents consistently mention good value for money, with most kids finding them comfortable and true to size. The main complaints center around durability concerns and some quality control issues.
Several Spanish-speaking customers noted good quality for the price (“Buena calidad con respecto al precio”), though one mentioned receiving shoes of different sizes (“Viene un zapato más grande que el otro”).
The sizing feedback is mixed, but after testing with multiple kids, I found they generally run true to size. The confusion seems to stem from parents comparing to different brands that have varying sizing standards.
Value Assessment
At approximately $45, these cleats hit the sweet spot for recreational youth soccer. Here’s the cost breakdown that makes sense:
- Cost per game: Assuming 20 games per season = $2.25 per game
- Comparison to premium: $150 Nike cleats = $7.50 per game
- Growth factor: Kids outgrow cleats in 6-12 months regardless of quality
- Replacement cost: Easy to replace when outgrown without breaking the budget
For families with multiple kids in soccer, the math becomes even more compelling.
Final Verdict
The Good and The Bad
| Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|
| Outstanding value at $45 price point | Budget construction with visible glue work |
| True-to-size fit for most youth players | Limited durability for intensive use |
| Vibrant colors kids love | Poor performance on wet/muddy fields |
| Adequate traction on grass surfaces | Quality control issues (some received used pairs) |
| Comfortable for recreational play | Not suitable for competitive/travel teams |
Who Should Buy the DREAM PAIRS Soccer Cleats?
Perfect For:
- Recreational youth players (ages 5-12) – Ideal for house leagues and beginner programs
- Budget-conscious families – Excellent value when kids outgrow shoes quickly
- First-time soccer players – Good starter cleats without major investment
- Multi-sport athletes – Adequate for flag football and casual field sports
- Parents wanting vibrant colors – Kids love standing out on the field
Consider Alternatives If:
- Competitive travel soccer – Invest in higher-quality cleats for serious players
- Primarily turf fields – These are designed for grass surfaces
- Heavy, wet conditions – Look for cleats with better weather performance
- Kids with foot problems – May need cleats with superior arch support
Better Options for Specific Needs
- For competitive players: Nike Jr. Mercurial or Adidas X Ghosted (higher durability and performance)
- For turf surfaces: Adidas Copa Sense TF or Nike Phantom turf shoes
- For wide feet: New Balance Furon or wider-fit specific models
- For wet conditions: Adidas Predator or Nike Tiempo with better stud configuration
Final Recommendation
The DREAM PAIRS Boys Girls Soccer Cleats earn a solid recommendation for recreational youth soccer. At $45, they provide excellent value for families who need functional cleats without premium pricing. The comfort is adequate, traction works well on grass, and kids love the color options.
Yes, these are budget cleats with budget construction, but they serve their purpose well. For most youth players who will outgrow them in 6-12 months anyway, investing $150+ in premium cleats doesn’t make financial sense.
If your child is just starting soccer, plays recreationally, or you need backup cleats, these are an excellent choice. Just set realistic expectations about durability and performance limits.
🛒 Get the best deal:
Frequently Asked Questions
Do these cleats run true to size?
Yes, based on my testing with multiple kids, these generally run true to size. The sizing confusion in reviews seems to stem from comparisons to different brands. Order your child’s normal shoe size, but consider their sock thickness – thicker soccer socks might require sizing up by half a size.
How long do these cleats typically last?
For recreational youth soccer (1-2 practices and 1 game per week), expect 6-12 months of use before outgrowing. The construction quality supports typical youth usage patterns, but they won’t survive intensive daily training like premium cleats.
Are these suitable for artificial turf?
These are designed primarily for natural grass. While they’ll work on turf surfaces, the stud configuration isn’t optimal and may cause discomfort. If your child primarily plays on turf, consider turf-specific shoes instead.
What’s the return policy if sizing is wrong?
Amazon’s standard return policy applies. Several parents in reviews mentioned successful exchanges for different sizes. I recommend ordering early in the season to allow time for exchanges if needed.
How do these compare to name-brand cleats?
They’re adequate for recreational play but don’t match the performance, durability, or build quality of premium Nike or Adidas cleats. However, at 1/3 the price, they’re excellent value for most youth players who prioritize function over premium features.
Can these handle wet field conditions?
Limited performance on wet grass. They’re manageable in light rain but struggle on muddy or saturated fields. The TPE sole doesn’t grip as well in wet conditions compared to higher-end rubber compounds.
Are there wide-width options available?
These don’t come in specific width options, but several parents mentioned they work well for kids with wider feet. The suede upper has some stretch, and the standard width seems to accommodate various foot shapes reasonably well.
What colors are available?
Available in royal blue/black, pink, purple, fluorescent green, orange, and several other vibrant combinations. The colors are genuinely bright and eye-catching – kids consistently love the visual appeal.
Review Scoring Summary
| Category | Score (1-10) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Comfort | 7.5 | EVA insole provides adequate cushioning for youth weights |
| Traction | 7.0 | Good on grass, struggles in wet conditions |
| Durability | 6.0 | Budget construction, typical youth season lifespan |
| Ball Control | 7.0 | Suede upper provides decent touch for developing players |
| Value for Money | 9.0 | Outstanding value at $45 price point |
| Sizing Accuracy | 8.0 | Generally true to size despite review confusion |
| Style Appeal | 8.0 | Vibrant colors, kids love the appearance |
| Overall Score | 7.4 | Solid choice for recreational youth soccer |
Get the best price on Amazon: