Last Tuesday, after burning through yet another pair of cheap running shoes that promised the world but delivered blisters, I needed something reliable for my mixed training routine. Mike here, and having tested dozens of trail shoes over the past decade, I was skeptical when I stumbled across the Kricely Men’s Trail Running Shoes on Amazon. At $47, they sat right in that sweet spot where you hope for decent quality but prepare for disappointment. That’s why I spent 8 weeks putting these through every test I could imagine – from rocky hiking trails to gym sessions to daily errands. After logging over 150 miles and 40+ hours of wear, here’s the unfiltered truth about whether these budget trail shoes can actually deliver.

Technical Specifications
- 💰 Price: $47 ()
- ⚖️ Weight: 1.48 lbs per pair (men’s size 9)
- 🧪 Midsole material: EVA foam with basic cushioning
- 👟 Upper material: TPU+Knitted Mesh
- 🦶 Sole material: Rubber with X-GRIP pattern
- 🏃♂️ Category: Trail running/cross-training hybrid
- 🎯 Best for: Light trails, gym workouts, casual wear
- ⏱️ Testing period: 8 weeks, 150+ miles, 40+ hours of wear
Design, Build Quality & Real-World Performance

Right out of the box, the Kricely trail shoes made a solid first impression. The TPU+Knitted Mesh upper feels surprisingly well-constructed for a $47 shoe – not premium by any means, but definitely a step above the paper-thin materials I’ve seen on other budget options. The reflective strips aren’t just for show either; they actually provide decent visibility during my early morning runs.
The mesh breathability is legit. During my Texas summer testing (we’re talking 95°F+ with humidity), my feet stayed noticeably cooler than in my previous pair of budget trail shoes. The knitted construction allows actual airflow, not just the promise of it. However, this breathability comes with a trade-off – these aren’t even remotely waterproof despite some marketing suggestions.

Fit, Lockdown & Comfort Experience
Here’s where things get interesting. The fit runs large – and I mean noticeably large. I typically wear a size 10 in Nike and New Balance, but the 10 in these Kricelys had enough room for thick hiking socks plus some extra space. Based on my testing and consistent feedback from other users, I’d recommend going down a half size for most guys.
The toe box is surprisingly roomy, which is actually a plus for longer activities. During my 8-mile trail hikes, I never felt cramped or pinched, even after my feet naturally swelled. The lacing system provides decent lockdown, though nothing spectacular. It gets the job done but won’t win any awards for precision fit.

Cushioning & Support Reality Check
Let me be straight about the cushioning – it’s adequate for the price point, but don’t expect Brooks or New Balance levels of comfort. The EVA midsole provides basic impact protection, but after about an hour of pavement pounding, my feet definitely felt it. This isn’t a shoe for marathon training or long road runs.
Where it shines is on softer surfaces. Trail runs, grass fields, and gym floors felt comfortable throughout my testing. The cushioning seems optimized for varied terrain rather than pure impact absorption. As for arch support, it’s minimal at best. If you have specific support needs, plan on adding your own insoles.
On-Trail Performance

The X-GRIP sole pattern isn’t just marketing fluff – it actually delivers solid traction on most surfaces. I tested these on rocky Texas hill country trails, muddy creek crossings, wet concrete, and gym floors. The grip impressed me consistently, especially on loose gravel and moderate mud. The aggressive tread pattern bites well into softer surfaces.
However, there’s a durability concern here. After 8 weeks of mixed use, I’m seeing noticeable wear on the forefoot area where I tend to push off. One user in my research actually showed photos of the tread wearing down to the sole after just 10 disc golf sessions involving pivoting on concrete. For light trail use and gym workouts, they’re holding up fine, but intensive use might accelerate wear.

Weather & Water Resistance Testing
Despite some marketing language suggesting water resistance, these shoes are not waterproof. I tested them in wet grass at 35°F with light sleet, and my socks were soaked within minutes. The mesh upper is simply too breathable to provide any meaningful water protection.
The positive side? They dry incredibly fast. After stepping into a creek during one of my trail runs, the shoes were nearly dry within 30 minutes of normal walking. So while they won’t keep water out, they also won’t stay waterlogged like some other shoes I’ve tested.
Meeting Your Trail & Training Goals – Does It Deliver?

For light trail running and cross-training, these shoes punch above their weight class. During my HIIT sessions, box jumps, and rope climbs, they provided adequate stability and grip. The wider toe box actually helped during squats and deadlifts, giving my feet room to spread naturally.
Trail-wise, they handle fire roads, packed dirt, and moderate rocky terrain confidently. I wouldn’t recommend them for technical single-track with lots of roots and rocks – the sole isn’t quite thick enough for serious rock protection. But for 80% of recreational trail running, they’ll get the job done.
Pros and Cons After 8 Weeks
✅ What Works
- Excellent value – Hard to beat at $47
- True breathability – Feet stay cool in hot weather
- Solid traction – X-GRIP pattern delivers on most surfaces
- Roomy toe box – Comfortable for longer activities
- Quick drying – Mesh doesn’t stay wet long
- Versatile styling – Works for trails and casual wear
❌ What Doesn’t
- Sizing runs large – Go down half a size
- Limited cushioning – Not for long pavement runs
- Durability concerns – Tread wear with intensive use
- No water protection – Despite marketing suggestions
- Minimal arch support – Add insoles if needed
- Thin sole – Can feel sharp rocks
Performance in Various Training Conditions

I put these through diverse conditions to see how they’d handle real-world training scenarios. On dry, packed trails, they excel – the grip is confident and the lightweight feel doesn’t slow you down. Muddy conditions revealed both strengths and weaknesses. The tread pattern clears mud reasonably well, but the mesh upper means your feet will get dirty fast.
Gym performance impressed me more than expected. The flat, stable platform works well for weightlifting, and the grip handles lateral movements during circuit training. Several users mentioned using these for Spartan races and obstacle course racing with positive results, though the water retention can be an issue during water obstacles.
Temperature Performance
Hot weather performance is where these shoes shine. The mesh upper provides legitimate ventilation, keeping feet comfortable even during intense summer workouts. Cold weather is more challenging – the breathable upper that works so well in heat becomes a liability when temperatures drop below 40°F.
Does Kricely Deliver on Their Promises?

Let’s fact-check the marketing claims against my 8-week testing experience:
“Lightweight and Flexible” – Confirmed. At 1.48 pounds per pair, these are genuinely lightweight without feeling flimsy. The flexibility is good for natural foot movement.
“Breathable and Comfortable” – Half true. Breathability is excellent, but comfort depends heavily on your use case. Great for short to medium activities, limited for extended wear on hard surfaces.
“Great Grip and Absorb Shock” – Grip is solid as advertised. Shock absorption is adequate but not exceptional. Don’t expect premium running shoe levels of impact protection.
“Fashion and Reflective Design” – The reflective elements work and look good. Style is subjective, but they’re definitely more interesting than basic black trainers.
The biggest disconnect is the implied water resistance. Multiple users reported wet feet in minimal moisture, and my testing confirmed this. The “trail running” designation is accurate for light trails but oversells the technical capability.
My Overall Assessment
| Category | Score (1-10) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Comfort | 6.5 | Good for moderate use, limited for extended wear |
| Durability | 6.0 | Holding up but showing wear patterns |
| Traction | 8.0 | Impressive grip on varied surfaces |
| Breathability | 8.5 | Excellent ventilation in hot conditions |
| Value | 8.0 | Hard to beat performance at $47 |
| Versatility | 7.5 | Works for multiple activities |
| Style | 7.0 | Attractive design with good color options |
| Overall Score | 7.0 | Solid budget choice with clear limitations |

What Other Trail Runners Are Saying
The community feedback aligns with my experience. Positive reviews consistently mention comfort, value, and grip. The negative patterns focus on durability concerns and sizing issues. Several runners noted these work great as secondary shoes for light training but wouldn’t recommend them as primary trail runners for serious athletes.
Spanish-speaking customers particularly praised the comfort level (“muy cómodas”) and value proposition (“buena calidad con respecto al precio”). The most common complaints centered around sizing running large and limited arch support.
Value Assessment
At $47, these shoes deliver solid value for recreational users. Compare that to $120+ name-brand trail shoes, and you’re getting about 70% of the performance for 40% of the price. For occasional trail runners, gym-goers, and casual wear, that math works out favorably.
The durability question becomes crucial for intensive users. If you’re running 20+ miles per week or doing daily high-impact training, the potential for accelerated wear might make premium options more cost-effective long-term.
Final Verdict
The Good and The Bad

After 8 weeks of honest testing, the Kricely Men’s Trail Running Shoes earn a solid 7.0/10. They’re not going to replace your premium running shoes, but they offer legitimate value for recreational athletes and casual users.
The standout features – breathability, traction, and price point – make these worth considering if you understand their limitations. The sizing issues and durability concerns prevent them from being an unconditional recommendation.
Who Should Buy the Kricely Men’s Trail Running Shoes?
Perfect for:
- Recreational trail runners doing 10 miles per week or less
- Cross-trainers needing versatile gym shoes
- Casual hikers on maintained trails
- Budget-conscious buyers wanting decent quality
- Secondary shoe for rotation with premium pairs
Skip if you:
- Run primarily on pavement for long distances
- Need serious technical trail protection
- Require significant arch support
- Plan intensive daily use
- Need waterproof footwear
Better Options for Specific Needs
If durability is your top priority, consider spending $30-40 more for New Balance or Brooks trail options. For serious technical trails, look at Salomon or Merrell. If you need maximum cushioning for road running, stick with dedicated running shoe brands.
However, if you want a versatile, breathable shoe for mixed light activities at an excellent price point, the Kricely trail shoes deliver real value. Just remember to size down and set realistic expectations.
Final Recommendation
I’d buy these again – but as a secondary pair, not my primary training shoe. At $47, they’ve earned their place in my rotation for gym sessions, easy trail runs, and casual wear. They’re not perfect, but they’re honest about what they deliver for the price.
🛒 Get the best deal:
Frequently Asked Questions
Review Scoring Summary
| KRICELY MEN’S TRAIL RUNNING SHOES – FINAL SCORES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comfort & Fit | 6.5/10 | Good for moderate use, sizing runs large |
| Durability & Quality | 6.0/10 | Acceptable for price, wear patterns emerging |
| Performance & Traction | 8.0/10 | Excellent grip on varied surfaces |
| Breathability | 8.5/10 | Outstanding ventilation in hot conditions |
| Value for Money | 8.0/10 | Hard to beat at $47 price point |
| Versatility | 7.5/10 | Works across multiple activities |
| OVERALL RATING | 7.0/10 | Solid budget choice with clear limitations |
Get the best price on Amazon:
