Real talk – after burning through 6 pairs of hiking shoes in two years, I was fed up with spending $150+ only to watch them fall apart after a season. That’s when my neighbor mentioned these NORTIV 8 low-tops he’d been crushing trail work in for months. Mike here, and at 175 lbs with size 10.5 feet, I was skeptical that a $47 hiking shoe could actually deliver. 8 weeks of aggressive testing later, here’s the unfiltered truth about whether budget can beat brand names.

Technical Specifications
- 💰 Price: $47 ()
- ⚖️ Weight: 1.8 lbs (men’s size 10)
- 🧪 Midsole material: MD foam cushioning
- 👟 Upper material: Synthetic leather with waterproof membrane
- 🦶 Sole material: Rubber with Multi-Directional Traction (MDT)
- 🏔️ Category: Low-top waterproof hiking shoes
- 🎯 Best for: Day hiking, work outdoors, trail walking, wet conditions
- 🌧️ Waterproof rating: Waterproof membrane construction
- ⏱️ Testing period: 8 weeks, 95 miles hiked, 40+ work days outdoors
Design, Build Quality & Real-World Performance

Let me be straight about first impressions – these don’t look like your typical budget hiking shoe. The synthetic leather upper feels substantial in hand, not thin or plasticky like some cheap alternatives I’ve tested. The rubber toe cap is properly thick and actually functional, not just cosmetic. When I first laced them up, the fit was immediately comfortable with my usual 10.5 size – no break-in pain that usually comes with stiffer hiking shoes.
The construction details impressed me more than expected. All stitching looks clean and consistent, no glue blobs or rough edges that scream “cut corners.” The waterproof membrane integration feels legitimate – not just a coating that’ll wash off after a few months. At 1.8 pounds per shoe, they’re definitely heavier than ultralight trail runners, but honestly lighter than most traditional hiking boots I’ve worn.

Trail Cushioning & Support Experience
Here’s where things get interesting. The MD foam midsole provides solid shock absorption – I tested this extensively on rocky Pennsylvania trails and concrete work surfaces. During 8-mile hikes with a 20-pound pack, my feet never felt beaten up the way they do in minimal shoes. The arch support is moderate but effective for my medium-arch feet.
However, I need to be honest about the weight. After 6+ hour days on trails, these definitely feel heavier than my previous Merrell or Salomon shoes. It’s not deal-breaking, but if you’re used to lightweight trail runners, there’s an adjustment period. The trade-off is solid protection – I’ve stepped on sharp rocks and roots with zero foot pain.

On-the-Trail Performance
I’ve put these through hell over 8 weeks: muddy creek crossings, steep rocky ascents, wet grass at 6 AM, and full days of landscaping work. The traction genuinely surprised me. The Multi-Directional Traction pattern grips well on loose dirt, wet rocks, and even slippery wooden bridges. I had zero slips during creek crossings that would have sent me tumbling in regular sneakers.
The waterproofing holds up. I’ve walked through ankle-deep puddles, morning dew-soaked trails, and even hosed them down after muddy work days – my feet stayed dry every time. This isn’t marketing BS; the membrane actually works. However, this comes with the usual waterproof trade-off: breathability suffers. On hot days (75°F+), my feet definitely get sweaty faster than in mesh trail runners.
Meeting Your Hiking Goals – Does It Deliver?
For day hiking and outdoor work, these punch way above their price point. I’ve tested them on 2-mile nature walks and 12-mile backpacking trips – both scenarios, my feet felt protected and comfortable. The toe protection saved me multiple times from root kicks that would have had me hobbling in lighter shoes.
Key Strengths
- Actually waterproof: Consistently kept feet dry in real wet conditions
- Solid value: $47 delivers performance comparable to $100+ alternatives
- True to size: Standard 10.5 fit perfectly with hiking socks
- Durable construction: 8 weeks of abuse, minimal visible wear
- Good traction: Confident grip on wet rocks and loose terrain
- Immediate comfort: No break-in period required
Key Weaknesses
- Heavy: Noticeably heavier than lightweight trail shoes
- Poor breathability: Feet get hot and sweaty in warm weather
- Lace quality: Cheap laces don’t hold knots well, will need replacement
- Tongue design: Slightly short, laces occasionally slip off
- Long-term durability concerns: Some reviewers report sole separation after 6-12 months
Performance in Various Trail Conditions

I tested these across Pennsylvania’s diverse terrain over 8 weeks. On dry, rocky trails like sections of the Appalachian Trail, the traction impressed me – no slipping on loose scree or smooth rock faces. The thick rubber sole protected against sharp edges that would have been painful in thinner shoes.
Wet conditions are where these really shine. During three separate creek crossings and multiple rainy-day hikes, my feet stayed completely dry. The waterproof membrane isn’t just marketing – it actually works. I even deliberately stepped through 4-inch deep puddles to test limits, and no water penetrated.

However, in hot weather (80°F+), the waterproof nature becomes a curse. My feet got uncomfortably sweaty during summer hiking, requiring frequent sock changes. If you’re primarily hiking in warm, dry conditions, breathable mesh alternatives might serve you better.
Snow and cold testing went well. During early spring hikes with patches of snow and mud, my feet stayed warm and dry. The traction held well on packed snow, though I wouldn’t trust them on ice without microspikes.
Does NORTIV 8 Deliver on Their Promises?

Let’s fact-check their marketing claims against my real-world testing:
“Waterproof synthetic leather and waterproof membrane construction” – CONFIRMED. After dozens of stream crossings and puddle-walking tests, these genuinely keep feet dry. The membrane integration feels substantial, not like a cheap spray coating.
“Multi-Directional Traction (MDT) improves grip” – MOSTLY TRUE. Traction is solid on dirt, gravel, and wet rocks. I felt confident on steep descents and loose terrain. However, on slick wooden bridges and wet roots, they’re good but not exceptional.
“Flexible MD midsole reduces foot fatigue” – PARTIALLY TRUE. The cushioning is adequate for day hikes, and I finished long days without significant foot pain. However, the weight factor means your legs work harder than with lighter shoes.
“All-day comfort” – TRUE with caveats. Comfort is genuinely good for 8+ hour days, but the poor breathability means hot, sweaty feet in warm weather. In cool conditions (under 70°F), all-day comfort is excellent.
The one claim I’m skeptical about is long-term durability. While my 8-week test showed minimal wear, many customer reviews report sole separation issues after 6-12 months of regular use. At this price point, that might be acceptable, but it’s worth knowing upfront.
My Overall Assessment

What Other Hikers Are Saying
After reading through hundreds of customer reviews, clear patterns emerge. The vast majority of hikers love the immediate comfort and waterproof performance. Landscapers and outdoor workers consistently praise the durability for work environments. However, long-term users report a common failure point: sole separation after 6-18 months of heavy use.
One reviewer perfectly captured my experience: “For the price, these are great hiking shoes. Just don’t expect them to last forever.” At $47, even if they last one solid season, the cost-per-use beats expensive alternatives that might last longer but cost 3x more.
Value Assessment
At $47, these represent exceptional value for casual to moderate hikers. Compare this to:
– Merrell Moab 3: $110-130 (2.3x more expensive)
– Salomon X Ultra 3: $120-140 (2.6x more expensive)
– Columbia Newton Ridge: $65-80 (1.4x more expensive)
For 60-80% of the performance at 35-40% of the price, the math works for most people. If you hike 20+ miles per week year-round, invest in premium shoes. For weekend warriors and occasional hikers, these deliver incredible bang for buck.
Final Verdict

The Good
- Genuinely waterproof performance
- Excellent value at $47 price point
- Immediate comfort, no break-in needed
- Solid traction on varied terrain
- True-to-size fit with good toe box room
- Protective rubber toe cap actually works
The Bad
- Heavy compared to modern trail shoes
- Poor breathability causes sweaty feet
- Cheap laces need immediate replacement
- Potential durability issues after 6-12 months
- Not ideal for hot weather hiking
Who Should Buy the NORTIV 8 Men’s Hiking Shoes?
Perfect for:
– Budget-conscious hikers seeking waterproof protection
– Outdoor workers needing durable, protective footwear
– Weekend warriors doing day hikes in wet conditions
– Anyone wanting to test hiking without major investment
– Hikers with wider feet who appreciate the roomy toe box
Skip if you:
– Primarily hike in hot, dry climates
– Need ultralight footwear for long-distance hiking
– Demand premium materials and multi-year durability
– Are sensitive to heavy, non-breathable shoes
Better Options for Specific Needs
For hot weather hiking: Consider Merrell Moab 3 Ventilator or Solomon X Ultra 3 GTX for better breathability
For ultralight backpacking: Look at Altra Lone Peak or Hoka Speedgoat for weight savings
For maximum durability: Invest in Danner or Lowa boots if longevity is priority over price
Final Recommendation
After 8 weeks of real-world testing, I’m genuinely impressed with what NORTIV 8 delivered for $47. These aren’t perfect shoes, but they’re damn good value shoes. The waterproofing works, comfort is solid, and traction inspires confidence on trails.
Yes, they’re heavy. Yes, your feet will get sweaty in summer. And yes, they might not last 3+ years like premium alternatives. But for most weekend hikers and outdoor workers, these represent an exceptional entry point into quality hiking footwear.
I’m keeping mine as my go-to wet weather and work shoes. For the price of dinner for two, you get hiking shoes that actually work. That’s a win in my book.
Get the best price on Amazon:
Frequently Asked Questions
Are these actually waterproof?
Yes, genuinely waterproof in my testing. I’ve walked through ankle-deep puddles, creek crossings, and wet grass with consistently dry feet. The membrane construction is legitimate, not just a spray coating.
How’s the sizing compared to other hiking shoes?
True to size for most people. I wear 10.5 in Nike and Merrell, and 10.5 fit perfectly in these with hiking socks. The toe box is slightly wider than average, which works well for people with broader feet.
Will these work for backpacking?
For day hikes and light overnight trips, absolutely. I tested them with a 20-pound pack on 8-mile hikes with good results. For multi-day backpacking with heavy packs, you might want something with more ankle support.
How long do they typically last?
Based on customer reviews, expect 6-18 months with regular use. My 8-week intensive testing showed minimal wear, but many long-term users report sole separation issues after extended use. At $47, that’s still decent value.
Are they good for work environments?
Excellent for outdoor work. I tested them landscaping, construction site visits, and warehouse work. The toe protection, waterproofing, and slip resistance work well. Just know they’re not steel-toe rated if that’s required.
Do they run hot in summer?
Yes, significantly. The waterproof membrane severely limits breathability. In 75°F+ weather, expect sweaty feet. They’re much better for cool/cold weather hiking or wet conditions.
Should I replace the laces immediately?
I’d recommend it. The included laces don’t hold knots well and feel cheap. Upgrade to quality hiking laces for $5-10 and you’ll have a much better experience.
How do they compare to Merrell or Columbia shoes?
For waterproofing and protection, they’re comparable. Merrell and Columbia typically offer better breathability, lighter weight, and longer durability, but at 2-3x the price. These deliver 70-80% of the performance for 35% of the cost.
Comprehensive Scoring Summary
| Category | Score (1-10) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Waterproofing | 9.0 | Genuinely effective membrane, passed all real-world tests |
| Comfort & Fit | 7.5 | Good cushioning, true sizing, but heavy and non-breathable |
| Traction & Grip | 8.0 | Confident performance on varied terrain, good wet grip |
| Durability | 6.5 | Early signs positive, but customer reports concerning long-term |
| Value for Money | 9.0 | Exceptional performance for $47 price point |
| Versatility | 7.0 | Great for hiking/work, limited by weight and breathability |
| Build Quality | 7.0 | Solid construction, good materials for price range |
| Overall Score | 7.8 | Excellent value choice for budget-conscious hikers |
