Saucony Women’s Versafoam Excursion TR13 Trail Running Shoe Review – Budget Trail Performance Tested 2025

Between my morning trail walks and weekend hiking with friends, I was tired of my old sneakers sliding on loose gravel and offering zero protection on rocky paths. Sarah here, and when my favorite trail buddy mentioned the Saucony Versafoam Excursion TR13, I was skeptical about budget trail shoes but curious enough to give them a shot. 8 weeks of real-world testing later, here’s the unfiltered truth about these $60 trail runners.

Design, Build Quality & Real-World Performance

Right out of the box, these shoes surprised me with how lightweight they felt – at 8.2 ounces, they’re definitely on the lighter side for trail shoes. The grey and peach colorway is more muted than the online photos suggest, which I actually prefer for hiding dirt during those muddy morning dog walks.

The knit mesh upper feels breathable immediately, and the supportive overlays do provide some structure without making the shoe feel bulky. The lacing system locks down well, though I did find the laces a bit thin for my liking – they tend to loosen slightly during longer walks.

Trail Cushioning & Support Experience

The VERSAFOAM midsole delivers a firm but responsive feel that’s perfect for varied terrain. During my regular 3-mile trail loop, I noticed the cushioning handled both packed dirt and rocky sections reasonably well. It’s not the plush, bouncy feel you’d get from premium trail runners, but for the price point, it provides adequate protection.

Where these shoes really shine is on moderate inclines and uneven surfaces. The 8mm drop feels natural for someone transitioning from regular sneakers to trail-specific footwear. I tested them on everything from smooth park paths to loose gravel trails, and the support felt consistent throughout.

However, I’ll be honest – during longer hikes (4+ hours), I definitely felt more foot fatigue than I would with higher-end trail shoes. The arch support is minimal, so if you have high arches like several reviewers mentioned, you’ll likely need aftermarket insoles.

On-the-Trail Performance

The triangular-lugged outsole is genuinely impressive for trail grip. On loose gravel, muddy sections, and even some wet rock, these shoes provided confidence-inspiring traction. I tested them on steep switchbacks during a weekend hike in moderate rain, and never felt like I was going to slip.

The grip pattern does tend to collect small rocks and debris, but they shake out easily enough. One Spanish-speaking reviewer mentioned “En suelo mojado, se deslizan fácilmente” (they slip easily on wet ground), but I found the opposite to be true on natural trail surfaces – though they’re definitely not great on wet pavement or smooth concrete.

The toe protection from the overlays worked well during my testing. I kicked plenty of rocks and roots without any discomfort, and the reinforced areas held up to the abuse.

Performance in Various Trail Conditions

Dry Trail Performance

On dry, packed trails, these shoes are in their element. The mesh upper breathes well during warmer weather, and I never experienced any hot spots or excessive moisture buildup during 2-3 hour hikes. The traction pattern grips beautifully on dry dirt, loose gravel, and even dusty rock surfaces.

Wet Weather Testing

While not waterproof (and not claiming to be), these shoes handle light moisture reasonably well. During a drizzly morning hike, my feet stayed comfortable for about 90 minutes before I started feeling dampness seeping through the mesh. For occasional wet conditions, they’re adequate, but if you frequently hike in wet climates, you’ll want something with better water resistance.

Rocky Terrain Assessment

The rock protection is decent for the price point. I could feel larger, sharp rocks through the sole, but nothing painful or concerning. The triangular lugs provide good grip on rock surfaces, though I’d be cautious on smooth, wet rock where any trail shoe would struggle.

Does Saucony Deliver on Their Promises?

Let’s examine Saucony’s key marketing claims against real-world experience:

Claim: “Trail specific knit mesh with supportive overlays locks your foot into place”

Reality: ✅ Partially delivered. The foot lockdown is good for casual trail use, though the thin laces do loosen over time. The supportive overlays do provide structure, but serious trail runners might want something more substantial.

Claim: “Triangular-lugged outsole grips the terrain for rock-solid footing”

Reality: ✅ Delivered. This is actually the shoe’s strongest feature. The traction is genuinely impressive for the price point and handles most trail conditions confidently.

Claim: “VERSAFOAM cushioning provides a responsive feel for every stride”

Reality: ⚠️ Moderately delivered. The cushioning is responsive but minimal. It’s adequate for light-to-moderate trail use but lacks the comfort for extended hiking or high-impact activities.

Claim: “Durable protection for any trail that comes your way”

Reality: ❌ Not delivered. This is where these shoes fail significantly. The fabric quality around the ankle collar is poor, with multiple users reporting tears within weeks or months of light use.

My Overall Assessment

After 8 weeks of testing, I have mixed feelings about these shoes. When they’re working well, they’re genuinely enjoyable to wear – lightweight, good traction, comfortable for moderate distances. But the durability issues are impossible to ignore.

Category Breakdown (Adapted for Trail Running)

• 🦶 Comfort & Fit: 7.5/10 – Immediately comfortable, true to size for most users
• 🏔️ Trail Traction: 8.5/10 – Excellent grip on varied terrain, confidence-inspiring
• 💪 Support & Stability: 6.5/10 – Adequate for recreational use, minimal arch support
• 🛡️ Protection & Durability: 4.0/10 – Poor fabric quality, systematic tearing issues
• 🏃‍♀️ Performance: 7.0/10 – Good for intended use, lightweight and responsive
• 💵 Value for Money: 6.0/10 – Good features but durability concerns affect value
• 🎨 Style & Aesthetics: 7.5/10 – Attractive colorways, good trail shoe look
• 🌧️ Weather Resistance: 5.5/10 – Basic protection only, not waterproof

What Other Trail Enthusiasts Are Saying

The customer feedback reveals a clear pattern. Users consistently praise the initial comfort and traction, with one 74-year-old reviewer noting: “These fit like a glove. As a 74-year-old it’s very important I give my feet good support… It is important we keep our stability and value ourselves by wearing good Footwear.”

However, the durability concerns are widespread and documented. A long-time Saucony customer reported: “I have bought this line & another TR multiple times and they always last over a year. I purchased these ahead of a trip to Universal… On the 5th day, I started noticing the holes on the inside top near the ankle.”

Another user shared: “I ordered mid April, and they did not hold up well at all. I started wearing on May 1st and by May 23rd, they looked like this… This pair is highly disappointing. It has made me question ever buying another pair of Saucony’s again.”

Value Assessment: Budget Trail Shoes Reality Check

At around $60, these shoes occupy an interesting position in the trail running market. They offer legitimate trail-specific features – good traction, lightweight construction, adequate protection – but the durability issues significantly impact their value proposition.

For families on a budget or occasional trail walkers, the cost-per-wear might still work out if you get 6-12 months of use. However, serious trail runners or frequent hikers should invest in more durable options, even if it means spending more upfront.

Final Verdict

The Good and The Bad

Who Should Buy the Saucony Versafoam Excursion TR13?

✅ Perfect for:

• Casual trail walkers and light hikers
• Budget-conscious buyers needing basic trail features
• Those transitioning from regular sneakers to trail shoes
• Occasional outdoor enthusiasts (1-2 times per month)
• People who prioritize traction and comfort over longevity

❌ Skip if you need:

• Shoes for serious trail running or frequent hiking
• Long-term durability (1+ years of regular use)
• Significant arch support or cushioning
• Weather-resistant or waterproof features
• Professional-grade trail running performance

Better Options for Specific Needs

For better durability: Consider Merrell Trail Glove or ASICS Gel-Venture series

For more cushioning: Look at Hoka Speedgoat or Brooks Cascadia

For budget alternatives: New Balance Fresh Foam Hierro or Adidas Terrex series

Final Recommendation

I want to be completely honest with you – these shoes are a mixed bag. If you’re looking for an entry-level trail shoe for occasional use and you’re comfortable with the possibility of needing replacement within 6-12 months, they offer good value. The traction really is excellent, and they’re genuinely comfortable for moderate trail activities.

However, if durability is important to you, or if you plan to use them frequently, I’d recommend investing in a more expensive but longer-lasting option. The fabric quality issues are too widespread to ignore, and many long-time Saucony customers are reporting disappointment with this specific model.

🛒 Get the best deal:

Frequently Asked Questions

Do these run true to size?

Yes, most users find them true to size. I wear an 8.5 normally and the 8.5 fit perfectly with room for hiking socks. A few users with wide feet recommend sizing up half a size.

How long do they typically last?

Based on extensive customer feedback, expect 3-12 months of regular use before fabric durability issues appear. This varies significantly based on usage frequency and terrain type.

Are they waterproof?

No, these are not waterproof or even water-resistant. The mesh upper will absorb moisture in wet conditions. They’re designed for dry to slightly damp trail conditions.

Can I use these for regular walking on pavement?

Absolutely! Many users report using them for daily walks, dog walking, and casual wear. The traction pattern works fine on pavement, though it may wear faster than on trails.

Do I need to size up for hiking socks?

Most users find their normal size accommodates medium-thickness hiking socks comfortably. The toe box is reasonably roomy.

How do they compare to more expensive trail shoes?

They offer about 70% of the performance of $120+ trail shoes at half the price. The main compromises are in durability, advanced cushioning, and weather protection.

What’s the return policy if I have durability issues?

Amazon’s standard return policy applies. Many users report successful returns when fabric tearing occurs within the first few months, even outside the standard return window.

Are these good for people with plantar fasciitis?

The arch support is minimal, so they’re not ideal for plantar fasciitis sufferers unless you add supportive insoles. Several users mentioned needing aftermarket arch support.

Review Scoring Summary

Bottom Line: A decent entry-level trail shoe with excellent traction but significant durability concerns that limit its value for frequent users.

Get the best price on Amazon: