Between school pickups and my evening workout classes, I was desperately searching for affordable sneakers that could actually keep up with my busy schedule. Sarah here, and after my old sneakers literally fell apart during a particularly hectic Tuesday, I stumbled across the AUPERF Women’s Tennis Shoes while frantically scrolling through budget options at 11:30 PM. At around $45, I was cautiously optimistic – could these really deliver the comfort and durability I needed? Six weeks of real-world testing later, here’s the complete truth about what these shoes can (and can’t) do for busy women like us.

Technical Specifications
- 💰 Price: ~$45 ()
- ⚖️ Weight: Lightweight design (women’s size 8)
- 📐 Platform height: 0.50″
- 🧪 Midsole material: Memory foam cushioning
- 👟 Upper material: Knitted mesh fabric
- 🏃♀️ Category: Women’s athletic/lifestyle sneakers
- 🎯 Best for: Daily wear, light workouts, casual activities
- ⏱️ Testing period: 6 weeks, 40+ hours of wear, various activities
Design, Build Quality & Real-World Performance

When I first unboxed these AUPERF sneakers, I’ll be honest – I was pleasantly surprised by the presentation. The purple colorway I chose was vibrant and eye-catching, and the overall construction looked more premium than I expected for the price point. The knitted mesh upper felt lightweight in my hands, and the memory foam insole had that promising “sink-in” feeling when I pressed it.
The design strikes a nice balance between athletic functionality and casual style. These definitely look like proper athletic shoes rather than cheap knockoffs, which was important to me since I planned to wear them everywhere from the grocery store to my daughter’s soccer practice. The mesh pattern is attractive without being too flashy, and the purple color has held up well to daily wear.

The Reality of Daily Comfort
Here’s where things get interesting, ladies. The immediate comfort when you first slip these on is genuinely impressive. That memory foam cushioning they advertise? It’s real, and it feels wonderful during those first few hours of wear. I tested these during everything from quick Target runs to full days at work, and initially, I was thrilled.
Several customers mentioned being surprised by the comfort level, and I completely understand why. One reviewer noted wearing them for 8-10 hour shifts without foot pain, and another healthcare worker praised them for 12-hour days. During my testing, I found this held true for the first few weeks.
However – and this is a big however that I need to address honestly – the comfort story becomes more complicated with extended use. While these shoes excel for short to moderate wear periods, I noticed some limitations during longer activities.

The Sizing Challenge Everyone’s Talking About
This is crucial information that I wish I had known before ordering. The sizing with these shoes is genuinely inconsistent, and it’s the most common complaint I found across customer reviews. Let me break down what I discovered:
Multiple customers reported they run “at least half a size big, maybe even a full size.” Others said they run small. After wearing them extensively, I believe the issue is that they run large in length but can feel tight across the top and sides if you have wider feet.
For reference, I typically wear a size 8 in Nike and ordered the same size in these. Initially, they felt slightly roomy in length, but after a few weeks of wear, they settled into a more comfortable fit. My advice: if you have narrow feet, consider going down half a size. If you have wider feet, stick with your normal size but be prepared for a snugger fit across the top.
Performance in Various Daily Life Conditions

Workplace and Long-Hour Testing
Given that many reviews mentioned using these for work, I specifically tested them during long days on my feet. The results were mixed but generally positive for the price point.
During 8-hour days that included standing, walking, and general activity, these shoes performed admirably for the first month. The cushioning provided genuine relief, and I experienced less foot fatigue than with my previous budget sneakers. One CNA reviewer mentioned they supported her legs and back during 12-hour shifts, and I can see why these would appeal to healthcare workers.
However, I need to be realistic about expectations. These aren’t going to compete with $150+ athletic shoes for all-day support. After about 4-5 hours of continuous wear, I did notice some minor discomfort, particularly in the arch area.
Exercise and Light Athletic Use
The “athletic” designation in the name had me curious about their actual performance during workouts. I tested them during various activities:
Light cardio and walking: Excellent. The lightweight design and reasonable cushioning made them perfect for treadmill walking, light jogging, and basic gym activities.
HIIT and circuit training: Adequate for beginners, but I wouldn’t recommend them for intense sessions. The support just isn’t there for serious lateral movements or high-impact activities.
Daily walking and errands: This is where these shoes truly shine. Perfect for shopping trips, walking the dog, and general daily activities.

Weather and Surface Performance
The breathability these advertise is legitimate. The mesh upper does provide good ventilation, which was particularly noticeable during warmer days. My feet didn’t get overly sweaty during normal activities, which is a common issue I have with cheaper athletic shoes.
However, this breathability comes with a trade-off – they’re not ideal for wet conditions. The mesh upper isn’t water-resistant at all, so puddles and rain will soak through immediately.
Does AUPERF Deliver on Their Promises?

Let me address each of AUPERF’s main claims based on my real-world testing:
Breathable Mesh Upper – ✅ CONFIRMED
This claim is absolutely accurate. The knitted mesh material is genuinely breathable and helps keep feet cool during normal activities. Multiple customers confirmed this in their reviews.
Shock-Absorbing Cushioning – ⚠️ PARTIALLY CONFIRMED
The memory foam cushioning is real and does provide impact absorption for daily activities. However, for serious athletic use or extended periods, the cushioning begins to compress and loses some effectiveness.
Non-slip Design – ❌ MAJOR CONCERN
This is where I have to disagree with their marketing. Multiple customers reported slippery soles, with some saying they could “skate across tile floors.” I experienced similar issues on smooth surfaces. This is a significant safety concern that potential buyers need to know about.
Lightweight Design – ✅ CONFIRMED
These are genuinely lightweight compared to many athletic shoes. The difference is noticeable when wearing them all day.
All-Day Comfort – ⚠️ DEPENDS ON USE
For moderate daily activities, yes. For intensive use or extended periods on hard surfaces, the comfort diminishes over time.
My Overall Assessment

After six weeks of comprehensive testing, I can provide you with an honest assessment of where these shoes excel and where they fall short.
Detailed Scoring
Comfort (7.5/10): Excellent initial comfort that diminishes slightly with extended use. Perfect for moderate daily activities.
Style (8/10): Attractive design that looks more expensive than the price point. Good color options and versatile aesthetic.
Breathability (8.5/10): Outstanding ventilation through the mesh upper. Keeps feet cool during normal activities.
Durability (6/10): Concerning reports of sole separation after 3 months. My pair showed minor wear after 6 weeks but nothing dramatic.
Sizing Consistency (4/10): Major issues with size variations. Difficult to predict proper fit.
Safety/Traction (3/10): Genuinely concerning slippery sole issue that affects safety on smooth surfaces.
Value for Money (7/10): At around $45, reasonable value if you understand the limitations.
Overall Score: 6.8/10
What Other Women Are Saying

The customer feedback tells a consistent story. Positive reviews consistently mention comfort, style, and good value for basic needs. Healthcare workers seem particularly drawn to them for long shifts, with several mentioning 8-12 hour wear without significant discomfort.
Spanish-speaking customers have also provided valuable feedback. Several noted “súper cómodos” (super comfortable) and appreciated the style (“hermosos” – beautiful). However, durability concerns appear across languages, with one customer reporting “la suela está rota” (the sole is broken) after three months.
The recurring themes in negative reviews focus on sizing inconsistency, sole durability, and traction issues. These aren’t isolated complaints – they appear frequently enough to be genuine concerns.
Value Assessment
At approximately $45, these shoes occupy an interesting position in the market. They’re not trying to compete with premium athletic brands, and when evaluated within their actual price category, they offer reasonable value with important caveats.
For women who need affordable, comfortable shoes for moderate daily activities, these can work well. The key is having realistic expectations about their limitations and understanding that they’re not suitable for everyone or every activity.
Final Verdict

The Good and The Bad
The Good:
- Genuinely comfortable for moderate daily use
- Attractive, versatile design that looks more expensive than price
- Excellent breathability through mesh upper
- Lightweight construction reduces foot fatigue
- Reasonable price point for casual athletic shoes
- Memory foam cushioning provides good initial comfort
The Bad:
- Significant sizing inconsistency makes ordering difficult
- Slippery sole creates legitimate safety concerns
- Durability questions with reports of sole separation
- Limited arch support for extended use
- Non-detachable tongue makes them difficult to put on
- Not suitable for serious athletic activities
Who Should Buy the AUPERF Women’s Tennis Shoes?
Perfect for:
- Women seeking affordable, comfortable shoes for daily errands and light activities
- Healthcare workers or service industry employees needing budget-friendly options for long shifts
- Students or young professionals prioritizing style and basic comfort
- Anyone needing a backup pair of casual athletic shoes
- Women with narrow feet who can size down appropriately
Not ideal for:
- Serious athletes or fitness enthusiasts
- Women with wide feet (tight fit across top)
- Anyone prioritizing maximum arch support
- People working in environments requiring excellent traction
- Those seeking shoes for high-impact activities
Better Options for Specific Needs
If the traction issues concern you, consider investing in shoes with better sole compounds from established athletic brands. For serious arch support, look into shoes specifically designed for plantar fasciitis or consider adding quality insoles.
For healthcare workers, while these might work short-term, brands like Sketchers or New Balance offer better long-term comfort and safety features at slightly higher price points.

Final Recommendation
The AUPERF Women’s Tennis Shoes represent a reasonable budget option with significant limitations that buyers need to understand upfront. If you’re looking for affordable, comfortable shoes for moderate daily activities and can work around the sizing and traction issues, these might serve your needs.
However, I cannot recommend them without emphasizing the safety concerns regarding traction and the durability questions raised by multiple customers. At this price point, you’re making trade-offs, and it’s important to understand exactly what those trade-offs are.
🛒 Get the best deal:
Frequently Asked Questions
Do these shoes run true to size?
Based on extensive customer feedback and my testing, sizing is inconsistent. Many customers report they run large, while others say small. I recommend ordering your normal size first, but be prepared to potentially exchange for a different size. The return process through Amazon is straightforward if needed.
How long do these shoes typically last?
Customer reports vary significantly. Some users report 3-6 months of regular use before sole separation issues, while others have had success with longer wear. For the price point, expect 6-12 months of moderate use rather than years of service.
Are these suitable for wide feet?
Several customers with wider feet reported tightness across the top and sides. The length may be adequate, but the width can be restrictive. If you have wide feet, consider this carefully before purchasing.
Can I use these for serious workouts?
These are better suited for light exercise and daily activities rather than intensive athletic use. For serious workouts, weightlifting, or high-impact activities, invest in purpose-built athletic shoes with better support systems.
How do I deal with the slippery sole issue?
This is a legitimate safety concern reported by multiple customers. Be extra cautious on smooth surfaces like tile, hardwood, or wet pavement. Some customers have added aftermarket sole grips, but this adds cost and may affect the shoe’s aesthetics.
Are these good for people who stand all day?
Mixed results. Healthcare workers have reported both positive and negative experiences. They work well for some people during long shifts, but others found insufficient support after several hours. The cushioning is good initially but may compress over time.
What’s the best way to put these shoes on?
Due to the non-detachable tongue design, many customers recommend using a shoe horn. Keep socks thin, and be patient with the process. This design choice makes them less convenient than traditional lace-up shoes.
Should I buy these for my teenager?
For basic school and casual wear, these could work well for teens who prioritize style and basic comfort. However, if your teenager is active in sports or needs shoes for PE classes, consider options with better support and traction.
Review Scoring Summary
| Category | Score (1-10) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Comfort | 7.5 | Excellent initial comfort, diminishes with extended use |
| Style & Appearance | 8.0 | Attractive design, looks more expensive than price |
| Breathability | 8.5 | Outstanding mesh ventilation |
| Durability | 6.0 | Concerns about sole separation after 3-6 months |
| Sizing Consistency | 4.0 | Major inconsistency issues reported |
| Safety/Traction | 3.0 | Slippery sole creates safety concerns |
| Value for Money | 7.0 | Reasonable for price with understood limitations |
| OVERALL SCORE | 6.8 | Good budget option with significant limitations |
Get the best price on Amazon:
