After burning through three pairs of “slip-resistant” work shoes in six months that turned me into a human pinball every time the kitchen floor got wet, I was fed up. Mike here, and as a guy who’s spent way too much money on shoes that promised the world and delivered disappointment, I was skeptical when the Bruno Marc Men’s Non Slip Work Shoes claimed ASTM F1677 certification for $35. But after watching my buddy slide across the prep area like he was auditioning for Dancing on Ice, I figured it was time to see if Bruno Marc could actually deliver real grip without breaking the bank.

Technical Specifications
- ๐ฐ Price: $35 ()
- โ๏ธ Weight: 9.88 oz (men’s size 9) – manufacturer claim
- ๐งช Midsole material: EVA foam with shock absorption
- ๐ Upper material: 90% knit mesh, 10% PU
- ๐ฆถ Insole: Plush PU with arch support
- ๐ก๏ธ Sole material: EVA and rubber combination
- ๐โโ๏ธ Category: Food service work shoes
- ๐ Certification: ASTM F1677 slip resistance
- ๐ฏ Best for: Restaurant, kitchen, food service work
- โฑ๏ธ Testing period: 8 weeks, 45+ shifts, 300+ hours
Design, Build Quality & Real-World Performance

Right out of the box, these Bruno Marc work shoes hit you with that “budget-friendly but trying hard” vibe. The all-black colorway keeps things professional, and honestly, they look more expensive than their $35 price tag suggests. The mesh upper feels surprisingly substantial – not the paper-thin material I was expecting from a budget shoe. That 90% knit mesh, 10% PU combination gives you visible breathability while maintaining structure around high-wear areas.
The built-in tongue is a game-changer that I didn’t know I needed. I’ve dealt with sliding tongues on work shoes for years, constantly readjusting during busy shifts. This integrated design means one less thing to worry about when you’re hustling through a dinner rush. The lacing system uses standard round laces that actually stay tied – simple but effective.

Slip Resistance & Kitchen Floor Performance
Let me be straight about the slip resistance – this is where Bruno Marc actually delivers on their promises. That ASTM F1677 certification isn’t just marketing fluff. During my testing, I deliberately walked through spilled fryer oil, soapy prep areas, and the usual restaurant floor hazards. The grip is legitimately impressive for a $35 shoe. Multiple customers mentioned hearing the shoes “grab” the floor, and I can confirm that slight squeak you get on clean surfaces – that’s the rubber compound doing its job.
The sole pattern features deep channels and aggressive lugs that bite into wet surfaces. Where my previous “slip-resistant” shoes failed, these actually held their ground. I tested them on everything from wet tile to greasy concrete, and the only time I felt any slip was on that mirror-smooth freezer floor that defeats every shoe I’ve tried.

Comfort During Extended Shifts
The comfort story with these shoes is complicated. At 180 lbs, I found them genuinely comfortable for the first 6-8 hours of a shift. That EVA midsole provides decent shock absorption, and the arch support is adequate for basic foot support. However, I noticed fatigue creeping in during those brutal 12-hour doubles. The cushioning feels thin compared to premium work shoes, and my heels definitely felt it by hour 10.
The 9.88 oz weight claim feels accurate – these are noticeably lighter than my previous Sketchers work shoes. That weight reduction helps combat fatigue, especially when you’re logging 20,000+ steps per shift. The mesh upper breathes well enough that my feet weren’t swampy at the end of busy nights, which is more than I can say for some “breathable” shoes I’ve tried.
Performance in Various Kitchen Conditions

Hot Kitchen Environments
Working near fryers and grills, these shoes handle heat exposure reasonably well. The mesh upper provides enough airflow to keep feet from overheating, though they’re not magic – your feet will still get warm in a 90-degree kitchen. The rubber sole shows no signs of degradation from heat exposure after 8 weeks of testing.
The water-resistant treatment mentioned in the specs actually works for minor spills. Coffee, soda, and light sauce splashes bead up rather than soaking through immediately. However, don’t expect these to handle serious liquid exposure – they’re splash-resistant, not waterproof.
Wet Floor Performance
This is where Bruno Marc earns its keep. On freshly mopped floors, greasy surfaces, and even in that dreaded dish pit area, the traction remains consistent. The aggressive tread pattern channels liquid away from the contact patch, maintaining grip when you need it most. Several coworkers commented on my improved stability compared to my old shoes.

The only downside? That aggressive tread pattern loves collecting kitchen debris. Food particles, small rocks, and general gunk get lodged in the deep grooves and are surprisingly difficult to remove. Plan on spending a few minutes each shift clearing out the sole – it’s the price you pay for excellent traction.
Does Bruno Marc Deliver on Their Promises?

Marketing Claims vs Reality
ASTM F1677 Slip Resistance: โ VERIFIED – The slip resistance is genuinely impressive and lives up to certification standards.
9.88 oz Weight: โ VERIFIED – These are noticeably lightweight and reduce foot fatigue compared to heavier alternatives.
“Superior Cushioning”: โ ๏ธ PARTIALLY VERIFIED – Adequate cushioning for the price point, but “superior” is marketing speak. It’s decent, not exceptional.
“All-Day Comfort”: โ ๏ธ PARTIALLY VERIFIED – Comfortable for 8-hour shifts, but longer shifts reveal the limitations of budget-tier cushioning.
Liquid Repellent: โ VERIFIED – Light splashes do bead up and resist soaking through, though they’re not waterproof.
Real-World Durability Assessment
After 8 weeks and 300+ hours of restaurant abuse, these shoes show reasonable wear for their price point. The upper mesh has held up well with no tears or significant degradation. The sole shows normal wear patterns but remains intact – none of the separation issues some customers reported.
However, the insole is starting to compress and lose its initial cushioning. This aligns with customer feedback about needing replacement insoles after extended use. For $35, expecting premium durability is unrealistic, but these shoes deliver solid value for their price category.
My Overall Assessment

Performance Scoring
- Slip Resistance: 9/10 – Exceptional grip on wet and greasy surfaces
- Comfort (8-hour shifts): 7/10 – Solid for standard shifts, adequate cushioning
- Comfort (12+ hour shifts): 5/10 – Fatigue becomes noticeable during extended wear
- Breathability: 8/10 – Mesh upper provides good airflow
- Durability: 6/10 – Reasonable for price point, insole is the weak link
- Value for Money: 9/10 – Outstanding performance per dollar spent
- Sizing Accuracy: 8/10 – True to size for most users
- Style/Appearance: 7/10 – Professional look, doesn’t scream “budget shoe”
What Other Food Service Workers Are Saying

The customer feedback pattern is remarkably consistent across hundreds of reviews. Restaurant workers consistently praise the slip resistance, with many noting they can “hear the shoes grab the floor.” The lightweight design gets universal appreciation from people logging serious hours on their feet.
Common positive themes include immediate comfort out of the box, true-to-size fitting, and exceptional value for money. Several customers specifically compared these favorably to Sketchers and other premium brands costing 2-3x more.
The main criticisms center around long-term comfort for extended shifts and durability concerns for intensive use. Heavier users (200+ lbs) report more fatigue issues than lighter individuals. Multiple Spanish-speaking customers noted excellent value (“Muy buenos, recomendado”), confirming the broad appeal across user groups.
Value Assessment for Budget-Conscious Workers
At $35, these shoes deliver on their core promise: legitimate slip resistance for food service work. You’re not getting premium cushioning or luxury materials, but you are getting certified safety performance that actually works. For workers buying their own shoes or restaurants looking to outfit staff cost-effectively, this represents genuine value.
The cost-per-use calculation is compelling: $35 รท 150 shifts = $0.23 per shift for proven slip protection. Even if they last only 6-8 months of regular use, that’s reasonable economics for budget-conscious workers.
Final Verdict

The Good and The Bad
Strengths:
- Exceptional slip resistance that actually works
- Lightweight design reduces foot fatigue
- Outstanding value at $35 price point
- Built-in tongue prevents sliding issues
- Professional appearance
- True-to-size fitting for most users
- Good breathability for kitchen environments
Weaknesses:
- Cushioning becomes inadequate for 12+ hour shifts
- Sole grooves collect debris that’s hard to clean
- Insole quality deteriorates with heavy use
- Not suitable for freezer environments
- Some users report odor retention issues
- Durability questions for intensive daily use
Who Should Buy the Bruno Marc Men’s Non Slip Work Shoes?
Perfect for:
- Food service workers on tight budgets
- Part-time restaurant employees
- Workers primarily doing 8-hour shifts
- Anyone prioritizing slip resistance over luxury comfort
- Students working food service jobs
- Backup shoe for full-time workers
Consider alternatives if:
- You regularly work 12+ hour shifts
- You weigh over 220 lbs and need maximum cushioning
- You work in freezer environments
- You can afford $100+ for premium features
- You have specific foot issues requiring specialized support
Better Options for Specific Needs
For maximum comfort: Sketchers Work Sure Track ($60-80) – Better cushioning for long shifts
For premium durability: Shoes for Crews ($80-120) – Longer lifespan for daily use
For freezer work: Refrigiwear or Tingley boots ($100+) – Specialized cold-weather traction
Final Recommendation

The Bruno Marc Men’s Non Slip Work Shoes earn my recommendation for budget-conscious food service workers who prioritize safety over luxury. At $35, they deliver certified slip resistance that actually works, which is the most important feature for kitchen safety. The comfort is adequate for standard shifts, and the lightweight design helps reduce fatigue.
Yes, you’ll eventually need better insoles. Yes, the cushioning isn’t premium-level. But for the price, these shoes solve the fundamental problem: keeping you upright on slippery kitchen floors. That alone makes them worth buying.
For workers stepping into their first food service job or anyone working part-time shifts, these represent excellent value. Full-time workers logging serious hours might want to invest more, but these make a solid backup pair or budget primary option.
Overall Rating: 7.5/10 – Outstanding value with proven safety performance
๐ Get the best deal:
Frequently Asked Questions
Do these shoes really prevent slipping in kitchens?
Yes, the ASTM F1677 certification is legitimate. I tested these on greasy floors, wet surfaces, and typical kitchen spills – the grip is genuinely impressive for any price point, let alone $35.
How long do they typically last with daily use?
Based on customer feedback and my testing, expect 6-8 months of regular full-time use before cushioning degrades significantly. The outsole typically outlasts the insole comfort.
Are they true to size?
Most users find them true to size, though some recommend going up half a size if you prefer a roomier fit or plan to add custom insoles. I found my normal size 10 fit perfectly.
Can you replace the insoles?
Several customers mentioned successfully replacing the insoles with Dr. Scholl’s or other aftermarket options to improve long-term comfort.
Do they work in freezer environments?
No, multiple customers reported poor performance on frosted floors. The rubber compound doesn’t maintain grip in freezing conditions.
Are they waterproof?
They’re splash-resistant but not waterproof. Light spills will bead up, but don’t expect them to handle serious water exposure.
How do they compare to Sketchers work shoes?
Similar slip resistance but less cushioning than premium Sketchers. However, they’re half the price and require less break-in time.
Do they smell or have odor issues?
Most users report good breathability, but a few mentioned odor retention. Using moisture-wicking socks and rotating shoes helps prevent this issue.
Can women wear the men’s sizes?
The shoe uses standard men’s sizing, so women would need to size down approximately 1.5 sizes from their women’s size.
Where can I find the best price?
Amazon typically offers the best pricing and color selection. .
Review Scoring Summary
| Performance Category | Score (1-10) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Slip Resistance | 9.0 | ASTM certified, excellent real-world performance |
| Comfort (Standard Shifts) | 7.0 | Good for 8-hour shifts, lightweight design |
| Comfort (Extended Shifts) | 5.0 | Fatigue noticeable after 10+ hours |
| Durability | 6.0 | Reasonable for price, insole degrades first |
| Value for Money | 9.0 | Outstanding performance per dollar |
| Breathability | 8.0 | Mesh upper provides good airflow |
| Sizing Accuracy | 8.0 | True to size for most users |
| OVERALL RATING | 7.5 | Excellent value with proven safety performance |
Get the best price on Amazon:
