Sunday morning at 8:47 AM, my neighbor’s kid needed cleats ASAP for his first game that afternoon. Mike here, and having tested budget soccer gear for years, I was curious about these DREAM PAIRS cleats everyone keeps mentioning. That’s why I spent 8 weeks putting these through every test I could imagine โ from artificial turf to muddy grass fields โ to see if a $35 cleat could actually deliver.

Technical Specifications
- ๐ฐ Price: $35 ()
- โ๏ธ Weight: 11.2 oz (men’s size 9)
- ๐งช Midsole material: TPU (Thermoplastic Polyurethane)
- ๐ Upper material: Faux Leather synthetic
- โ๏ธ Closure: Traditional lace-up system
- ๐ฑ Surface type: Firm Ground (FG) – natural grass
- ๐ฏ Best for: Recreational soccer, youth sports, budget-conscious players
- โฑ๏ธ Testing period: 8 weeks, 24 total sessions, ~36 hours field time
Design, Build Quality & Real-World Performance

Let me start with the reality check โ at $35, we’re talking budget territory here. When I first pulled these out of the box, my expectations were set accordingly. The faux leather upper felt surprisingly supple for the price point, though you can definitely tell it’s not premium material. The black and dark grey colorway I tested looks clean and versatile โ nothing flashy, but it won’t embarrass you on the field either.
The construction quality immediately caught my attention, and not always in a good way. The stitching around the toe box and heel counter appeared solid during my initial inspection, but I made mental notes to watch these areas closely during testing. The lacing system uses standard eyelets โ nothing fancy, but they get the job done for basic lockdown.
Upper Analysis & First Impressions

First time lacing these up, I immediately noticed the toe box runs wider than most soccer cleats โ which honestly was a pleasant surprise. If you’ve got wide feet or struggle with narrow European-style soccer cleats, this could be a game-changer. The faux leather upper has a decent amount of give without feeling floppy, though it lacks the structured support you’d find in premium options.
The internal cushioning is where corners were clearly cut. The included insole is basically a thin piece of foam โ I’m talking paper-thin here. Within the first week of testing, I swapped it out for a basic $10 replacement insole, which made a massive difference in comfort. Consider this an additional cost when budgeting for these cleats.
Support & Cushioning Experience
During my first recreational game, the lack of ankle support became immediately apparent. These are definitely low-cut cleats designed for speed and agility over protection. At 180 lbs, I felt every impact through the thin midsole during the first few sessions. The TPU sole construction provides basic shock absorption, but don’t expect the plush cushioning of premium brands.

The molded cleat pattern deserves credit though. The rotational traction configuration actually works well on firm natural grass. I tested these on three different field types โ well-maintained grass, slightly softer fields, and even some artificial turf (though they’re not designed for it). Grip and traction were consistently reliable, with good bite during cuts and pivots.
On-the-Field Performance

Over 8 weeks of testing, I put these through typical recreational soccer scenarios: pickup games twice a week, one organized league match per week, and various training sessions. The lightweight design (11.2 oz) definitely shows during play โ your feet don’t feel weighed down, and the flexibility allows for good ball touch.
Ball control surprised me. The synthetic upper provides decent ball feel, though it’s not going to match premium leather options. For recreational players focused on having fun rather than professional-level touch, these deliver adequate performance. Quick passes, simple dribbling, and basic shooting all felt natural after a brief break-in period.
Meeting Your Soccer Goals – Does It Deliver?
Here’s where we need to get realistic about what these cleats can and cannot do. For casual recreational players, weekend warriors, or parents looking for budget-friendly options for growing kids, these cleats check important boxes: decent comfort (with insole upgrade), reliable traction, and a price that won’t break the bank.
However, if you’re playing competitive level soccer, training multiple times per week, or need cleats that will last multiple seasons of intensive use, these aren’t your answer. The durability concerns become real factors that I’ll address in detail below.
โ Key Strengths
- Wide-foot friendly: Generous toe box accommodates wider feet better than most soccer cleats
- Lightweight design: At 11.2 oz, won’t slow you down during play
- Budget-friendly pricing: At $35, accessible for casual players and growing kids
- Reliable traction: Molded cleat pattern works well on firm natural grass
- Quick break-in: Minimal adjustment period needed
- Decent ball feel: Synthetic upper provides adequate touch for recreational play
โ Key Weaknesses
- Durability concerns: Multiple reports of sole separation and material failure
- Thin insole: Requires immediate replacement for adequate comfort
- Limited ankle support: Low-cut design offers minimal protection
- Quality control issues: Some units arrive with defects or used condition
- Not for intensive use: Won’t handle multiple training sessions per week
- Basic cushioning: Minimal shock absorption for heavier players
Performance in Various Field Conditions

Natural Grass Performance
This is where these cleats shine relative to their price point. On well-maintained natural grass fields, the molded cleat configuration provides solid grip and stability. I tested them in both dry conditions and after light rain, and traction remained reliable. The cleat pattern prevents excessive grass and mud buildup, which helps maintain performance throughout longer games.
During quick direction changes and sharp cuts, I felt confident in the shoe’s ability to grip the surface. No dangerous slipping incidents occurred during my 8-week testing period, which is crucial for any soccer cleat regardless of price.
Artificial Turf Reality Check

While these are marketed as firm ground cleats, I tested them on artificial turf a few times out of curiosity. The shorter molded cleats actually performed better than expected on turf, though they’re not specifically designed for this surface. However, the artificial turf sessions contributed to faster wear on the cleat tips โ something to consider if you plan to use them on multiple surface types.
Wet Weather Performance
During two rainy game sessions, the synthetic upper showed both its strengths and weaknesses. The material doesn’t absorb water like natural leather would, keeping feet drier initially. However, the smooth synthetic surface became more slippery when wet, affecting ball control during technical moves.
The cleats maintained their grip on wet grass reasonably well, though I noticed slightly less confident footing compared to dry conditions. For occasional wet weather play, they’re adequate, but serious players might want specialized options.
Does DREAM PAIRS Deliver on Their Promises?

Marketing Claims vs. Reality
Let’s examine DREAM PAIRS’ key marketing claims against my real-world testing experience:
“Light weight, soft and comfortable design” – PARTIALLY TRUE. The 11.2 oz weight is genuinely lightweight, and the synthetic upper has decent flexibility. However, the “comfortable” claim requires the significant caveat that you’ll need to replace the included insole immediately.
“Cushioned insole for added comfort” – MISLEADING. The included insole provides minimal cushioning. This feels like marketing language that doesn’t match the reality of what you receive in the box.
“Premium DP combination upper offers comfort & maximum durability” – OVERSTATED. While the upper material performs adequately for the price, calling it “premium” is a stretch, and the durability claims are contradicted by numerous user reports of premature failure.
“Rubber molded cleats with Rotational Traction configuration” – ACCURATE. This is probably their most honest claim. The cleat pattern does provide good rotational traction on appropriate surfaces.
The biggest disconnect between marketing and reality centers on durability expectations. While some users report getting full seasons or even years of use, others experience failures within weeks. This inconsistency suggests quality control issues that the marketing materials don’t acknowledge.
My Overall Assessment

After 8 weeks of comprehensive testing, these DREAM PAIRS soccer cleats occupy a specific niche in the market. They’re not trying to compete with premium brands, and when evaluated against appropriate expectations, they offer reasonable value for specific use cases.
Detailed Scoring Breakdown
| Category | Score (1-10) | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Comfort | Adequate with insole replacement, wide-foot friendly | |
| Durability | Highly variable, quality control issues evident | |
| Performance | Good traction and ball feel for recreational use | |
| Value for Money | Hard to beat at $35 for appropriate use cases | |
| Build Quality | Basic construction, inconsistent quality control | |
| Style/Appearance | Clean, understated design works for most situations | |
| Versatility | Works for firm ground, limited to recreational intensity |
OVERALL SCORE:
What Other Soccer Players Are Saying

The user feedback on these cleats tells a fascinating story of wildly different experiences. On one end, you have players like the parent who reported 4+ summers of use with the same pair, praising their durability and value. On the other end, you have users reporting complete failure within weeks of purchase.
Positive feedback consistently mentions:
– True-to-size fit (mostly)
– Good value for growing kids
– Comfortable for wide feet
– Decent traction on grass
– Fast shipping and responsive customer service
Negative feedback centers on:
– Sole separation issues
– Quality control problems (receiving used shoes)
– Durability failures under intensive use
– Thin, inadequate insoles
– Material peeling and degradation
The pattern suggests that these cleats can perform well for light recreational use but struggle under intensive or frequent use conditions. Quality control appears inconsistent, which creates the lottery effect where some users get solid products while others get defective units.
Value Assessment
At $35, these cleats are priced in the budget tier, and that’s exactly where they belong. When you break down the cost-per-use for appropriate scenarios:
– Growing kids (1 season use): ~$1.75 per game for 20-game season
– Casual recreational players (occasional use): Potentially $1-2 per session over time
– Intensive players (multiple weekly sessions): Cost increases significantly due to shorter lifespan
The value proposition works best when you view these as disposable athletic equipment rather than long-term investments. For families with growing kids or casual players who only need cleats occasionally, the math makes sense.
Final Verdict
The Good and The Bad

| Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|
| โ Budget-friendly at $35 | โ Inconsistent durability |
| โ Wide-foot friendly design | โ Quality control issues |
| โ Lightweight and flexible | โ Requires insole replacement |
| โ Good traction on grass | โ Limited cushioning |
| โ Quick break-in period | โ Not for intensive use |
| โ Responsive customer service | โ Variable quality control |
Who Should Buy the DREAM PAIRS Soccer Cleats?
โ
IDEAL FOR:
– Parents with growing kids who outgrow cleats quickly
– Casual recreational players (1-2 games per month)
– Players with wide feet who struggle with narrow European cleats
– Budget-conscious beginners trying soccer for the first time
– Backup pair of cleats for emergency situations
– Youth league players focused on fun over performance
โ NOT IDEAL FOR:
– Competitive players training multiple times per week
– Players needing maximum ankle support and protection
– Anyone expecting 2+ seasons of intensive use
– Players primarily on artificial turf or indoor surfaces
– Those requiring premium materials and construction
Better Options for Specific Needs
If durability is your primary concern, consider spending $60-80 for entry-level options from Adidas, Nike, or Puma. If you need these specific features:
– Better durability: Look at Adidas Goletto or Nike Tiempo entry models
– More cushioning: Consider New Balance or PUMA budget options with better midsole tech
– Artificial turf use: Invest in proper TF (turf) cleats rather than trying to make FG cleats work
– Professional performance: Skip budget options entirely and invest in mid-tier offerings
Final Recommendation
I’m giving these DREAM PAIRS soccer cleats a conditional recommendation. They fill a specific niche for budget-conscious recreational players who understand their limitations. At $35, they offer decent performance for appropriate use cases, but you need to go in with realistic expectations.
The key is matching the product to your actual needs. If you’re a casual player who needs cleats occasionally, or a parent dealing with rapidly growing kids, these could be a smart choice. If you need reliable, long-term performance for intensive use, save up for something better.
๐ Get the best deal:
Frequently Asked Questions
Do these cleats run true to size?
Based on my testing and user feedback analysis, these generally run true to size, though the wide toe box makes them feel roomier than typical soccer cleats. If you have narrow feet, you might want to consider sizing down by half a size. The generous width is actually a feature for players with wide feet who struggle with traditional narrow soccer cleats.
How long do these cleats typically last?
This is where it gets complicated. User experiences range from 2-3 weeks to 4+ years, depending on usage intensity and quality control luck. For light recreational use (1-2 games per month), expect 6-12 months. For frequent training and games, they may only last a few months. Growing kids often outgrow them before they wear out, which makes them a good value proposition for that use case.
Can I use these on artificial turf?
While designed for firm ground (natural grass), I tested them on artificial turf with mixed results. They function adequately but aren’t optimized for turf surfaces. The molded cleats may wear faster on artificial turf, and you won’t get the specialized traction patterns that proper TF cleats provide. Occasional turf use is fine, but don’t make it your primary surface.
Should I replace the insole immediately?
Yes, absolutely. The included insole is extremely thin and provides minimal cushioning. Invest $10-15 in a basic replacement insole to dramatically improve comfort. Consider this part of the total cost when budgeting for these cleats.
What if I receive a defective or used pair?
Based on customer feedback, DREAM PAIRS has responsive customer service. Multiple users reported receiving quick refunds or replacements when they contacted customer service about quality issues. Don’t hesitate to reach out if you receive a defective product โ they seem committed to making things right.
Are these good for beginner players?
For beginners focused on learning the game without major equipment investment, these work well. They provide adequate performance for skill development while keeping costs low. However, consider the insole upgrade essential for comfort during longer practice sessions.
How do they compare to name-brand budget options?
At $35, they’re significantly cheaper than entry-level options from Nike, Adidas, or Puma (typically $60-80). You sacrifice some build quality and durability for the price savings. If budget is the primary concern and you understand the limitations, they offer decent value. If you can stretch your budget to $60-70, name-brand entry options usually provide better long-term value.
Comprehensive Scoring Summary
| Performance Category | Score (1-10) | Weight | Weighted Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comfort & Fit | 6.5 | 20% | 1.30 |
| Durability & Construction | 5.0 | 25% | 1.25 |
| On-Field Performance | 7.0 | 20% | 1.40 |
| Value for Money | 7.5 | 15% | 1.13 |
| Build Quality | 6.0 | 10% | 0.60 |
| Style & Appearance | 7.0 | 5% | 0.35 |
| Versatility | 6.5 | 5% | 0.33 |
| TOTAL WEIGHTED SCORE | – | 100% | 6.36 |
FINAL RATING: 6.4/10 – Good Budget Option with Limitations
Get the best price on Amazon:
