HI-TEC Men’s Squash Shoes Review – Classic Design Meets Quality Concerns – 2025

Between equipment failures and the need for reliable court shoes, I’ve been testing the HI-TEC Men’s Squash shoes that have supposedly dominated British courts for decades. Mike here, and after experiencing my third pair of court shoes fail this year, I was curious if this £25 legend could actually deliver consistent performance. That’s why I spent 6 weeks putting these through every test I could imagine – from intense squash sessions to casual badminton. Here’s the unfiltered truth about Britain’s “all-time best-selling sports shoe.”

Design, Build Quality & Real-World Performance

First Impressions & Heritage Design

Let me be straight about the HI-TEC Squash shoe – this isn’t just another budget court shoe. When you’re holding a design that’s sold over 18 million pairs and hasn’t fundamentally changed since the 1970s, you’re looking at something that clearly got the basics right. The all-white leather and PU upper with dark green accents screams classic court aesthetic, and at first glance, the construction looks solid enough.

The shoe feels substantial in hand – not cheap or flimsy like some budget options I’ve tested. The gum rubber sole has that distinctive translucent look that serious court players recognize, and the suede reinforcements at high-stress points show thoughtful design. My size 9 felt true to sizing right out of the box, though I noticed the toe box runs slightly wider than modern athletic shoes.

Upper Analysis & Lockdown System

The upper combines PU leather, suede accents, and breathable mesh panels – a combination that should provide durability while allowing airflow. The lacing system is straightforward with metal eyelets that feel robust. What impressed me initially was the mid-foot webbing support overlays that cradle your arch during lateral movements.

During my first court session, the lockdown felt secure without being restrictive. The super soft Nylex collar and tongue lining that HI-TEC advertises does provide decent comfort, though it’s nothing revolutionary. The anti-slip heel lining feature works as advertised – my heel stayed planted during quick direction changes.

Court Feel & Impact Protection

Here’s where things get interesting. On the squash court, these shoes deliver exactly what they promise – exceptional court feel with minimal barrier between your foot and the ground. The flat sole design (no arch support or motion control features) allows for the quick pivots and direction changes that squash demands. It’s like driving a manual transmission car – you feel everything, which can be exactly what experienced players want.

The gum rubber outsole provides solid traction on indoor courts without being too grippy. I tested on both traditional wooden courts and modern synthetic surfaces, and the grip level felt appropriate – enough to stop you from sliding, but not so much that your foot gets stuck during pivots.

However, let’s talk about cushioning. There isn’t much. The Die Cut EVA sockliner provides basic comfort, but if you’re used to modern athletic shoes with extensive midsole technology, these will feel quite firm. After 90-minute squash sessions, I definitely felt the court through these shoes more than I would in my regular training shoes.

Performance in Various Court Conditions

Squash Court Performance

During my testing on both glass-back and traditional courts, the HI-TEC shoes performed exactly as a classic squash shoe should. The low-profile design allows for better court awareness, and the lateral stability is genuinely impressive for a budget shoe. Quick lunges to the front wall felt secure, and recovery back to center court was smooth.

The non-marking sole lived up to its promise – no scuff marks left on any court surface I tested on. Court managers and other players appreciate this, especially in clubs with strict footwear policies.

Badminton & Multi-Sport Testing

I also tested these during badminton sessions and found them equally capable. The lightweight design (around 12 oz) doesn’t weigh you down during jump shots, and the flat sole works well for the quick shuffles and lunges badminton requires. Several badminton players I spoke with mentioned using these shoes for decades, which speaks to their appropriateness for the sport.

Durability Testing – The Critical Issue

Now here’s where my testing revealed the elephant in the room. While my personal pair held up reasonably well during the 6-week testing period, I couldn’t ignore the alarming pattern of durability failures reported by recent customers.

Does HI-TEC Deliver on Their Promises?

Marketing Claims vs Reality

HI-TEC markets these as “the world’s first specifically designed shoe for squash” with “industry benchmark” performance. Let’s break this down:

✅ Court-Specific Design: Absolutely delivers. The flat sole, low profile, and lateral support features are exactly what squash demands.

✅ Non-Marking Sole: Confirmed. No court marking issues during extensive testing.

✅ Classic Aesthetic: If you want the traditional squash shoe look, this is it.

❌ Consistent Quality: This is where current production fails dramatically. Recent batches show quality control issues that contradict the brand’s reliability claims.

⚠️ “Industry Benchmark” Status: While historically accurate, current quality issues make this claim questionable for new purchases.

Value Proposition Analysis

At £20-30, these should represent exceptional value if they deliver even basic durability. The performance characteristics are solid, and for players who prefer minimal cushioning and maximum court feel, the design is spot-on. However, the quality control lottery makes the value proposition risky.

My Overall Assessment

The Good and The Bad

Performance Scoring

What Other Court Players Are Saying

The customer feedback reveals a fascinating divide. Players who bought these shoes in previous decades consistently praise their durability and performance, with many reporting 10+ years of use from single pairs. However, customers purchasing since 2020-2021 report dramatically different experiences.

Long-time users describe them as “the most comfortable sneaker ever” and mention wearing them “for decades.” These reviews consistently highlight exceptional durability and court performance that justify the shoe’s legendary status.

Recent purchasers tell a different story: “stitching started to come apart after two days,” “ripped open after 8 games,” and “fell apart after 6 months.” This pattern suggests a fundamental change in manufacturing quality or materials sourcing.

Final Verdict

Who Should Buy the HI-TEC Men’s Squash Shoes?

Consider These If You:

• Want authentic squash shoe design and performance characteristics
• Prefer minimal cushioning and maximum court feel
• Need budget-friendly court shoes for occasional use
• Don’t mind the quality control lottery for the low price
• Have narrow to normal width feet

Skip These If You:

• Need reliable, long-term durability
• Prefer cushioned, supportive athletic shoes
• Play court sports more than 2-3 times per week
• Can’t afford to replace shoes frequently due to quality failures
• Have wide feet or need extensive arch support

Better Options for Specific Needs

For reliable court sports performance: Consider Asics Gel-Rocket or Mizuno court shoes in the $60-80 range. More expensive but consistently reliable.

For budget court shoes with better quality control: Look at Head or Prince court shoes in similar price ranges with more consistent manufacturing.

For squash-specific performance: If you can find older stock or gently used pairs of these HI-TEC shoes, they may represent better value than current production.

Final Recommendation

The HI-TEC Men’s Squash shoes present a frustrating paradox. When they work properly, they deliver exactly what a traditional squash shoe should – excellent court feel, appropriate traction, and authentic design at an unbeatable price. The problem is the quality control lottery that makes purchasing them a gamble rather than a reliable investment.

If you’re willing to risk £25 on the chance of getting a good pair, and you understand you may need to return or replace them quickly, these could work for casual court sports use. However, I cannot recommend them as a primary shoe for serious players who need dependable equipment.

My advice: If you find older stock or can test them thoroughly before committing, they might be worth the gamble. For everyone else, spending 2-3 times more on a known-reliable brand will likely save money and frustration in the long run.

Current Rating: 6.2/10 – Good performance characteristics undermined by quality control issues

🛒 Check current deals:

Frequently Asked Questions

Are these shoes good for beginners to squash?

Yes and no. The design is perfect for learning proper squash movement and court feel. However, beginners who haven’t developed proper footwork might benefit from more cushioned shoes initially. The durability concerns also make them risky for new players who might not notice quality issues immediately.

How do these fit compared to regular sneakers?

They generally run true to size but with a slightly wider toe box than modern athletic shoes. Many users recommend ordering your normal athletic shoe size. If you’re between sizes, size up to accommodate thicker sports socks.

Can I use these for outdoor courts?

Absolutely not. These are designed specifically for indoor court surfaces. The gum rubber sole will wear out extremely quickly on outdoor courts, and the upper materials aren’t designed for outdoor conditions.

How long do they typically last?

This is where the current quality issues become apparent. Historical users report 5-10+ years of use, while recent customers report failures within days to months. If you get a good pair, expect 1-2 years of regular recreational use.

What’s the return policy if they fall apart quickly?

Return policies vary by retailer. Amazon typically offers good return options for defective products. Given the durability issues, I’d recommend purchasing from retailers with strong return policies and inspect the shoes carefully upon arrival.

Are there wide width options available?

No, these only come in standard width. Users with wide feet report mixed results – some find them accommodating, others find them too narrow. The toe box is wider than modern athletic shoes but narrower than dedicated wide-width options.

Can I replace the insoles for better cushioning?

Yes, many users successfully add aftermarket insoles for additional cushioning and arch support. This can help offset the minimal padding while maintaining the court feel characteristics.

Why are recent pairs so much less durable than older ones?

Based on customer feedback, this appears to be related to manufacturing changes, possibly including different materials, construction methods, or quality control standards. The exact cause isn’t clear, but the pattern is consistent across recent reviews.

Review Scoring Summary

Get the best price on Amazon: