Last Tuesday, chatting with my hiking buddy about gear failures, he mentioned something that caught my attention: “Check out those Camel Crown shoes – they’re not Merrell, but they’ve outlasted my last two pairs.” Mike here, and after burning through $300 worth of “premium” hiking shoes in 18 months, I was genuinely curious. That’s why I spent 4 months putting the Camel Crown Men’s Hiking Shoes through every test I could think of – from muddy Virginia trails to concrete sidewalks. Here’s whether this $65 underdog can actually deliver.

Technical Specifications
- 💰 Price: $65 ()
- ⚖️ Weight: 12.4 oz (men’s size 9)
- 🧪 Midsole material: Cushioned MD with memory foam
- 👟 Upper material: Leather and mesh combination
- 👟 Sole material: Durable rubber with aggressive tread
- 💧 Water resistance: Water repellent (not waterproof)
- 🥾 Category: Low-top hiking shoes/trail sneakers
- 🎯 Best for: Day hiking, trail walking, outdoor work, casual wear
- ⏱️ Testing period: 4 months, 85+ trail miles, daily wear testing
Design, Build Quality & Real-World Performance

Right out of the box, the Camel Crown shoes felt substantial without being heavy. The leather and mesh upper strikes a good balance – genuine leather reinforcement where you need it (toe cap, heel, high-wear areas) with mesh panels for breathability. At 12.4 ounces for a size 9, they’re definitely lighter than traditional hiking boots but still feel protective.

The lacing system deserves a mention – the eyelets are metal and positioned well for good lockdown. However, I’ll be honest about the stock laces: they’re the weak point. Mine lasted about 6 weeks before fraying. Several other users mentioned the same issue. I replaced them with aftermarket laces and haven’t looked back. The shoes actually come with an extra pair, which is a nice touch.
Trail Comfort & Impact Protection

My first real test was a 6-mile rocky trail in Shenandoah. Immediately, I noticed the cushioning felt responsive but not squishy – that’s the MD midsole working. The memory foam insole added a nice comfort layer without feeling like I was walking on marshmallows. After that initial hike, my feet felt fresh, and more importantly, I didn’t have any hot spots or pressure points.
The arch support hits the sweet spot for my medium arches. At 180 lbs, I need shoes that won’t collapse under load, and these maintained their support structure throughout extended wear. The heel cup locks your foot in place without being restrictive – I never experienced heel slippage, even on steep descents.
On-the-Trail Performance

Let me get straight to what matters: traction. These shoes grip. The aggressive lug pattern works exceptionally well on loose dirt, gravel, and even moderate mud. I tested them on wet rocks during a creek crossing – while I wouldn’t call them sticky rubber, they provided confident footing where cheaper shoes would’ve had me slipping.
The toe protection really shines on technical terrain. I’ve kicked plenty of rocks over 4 months, and the reinforced toe cap has held up admirably. No scuffs have penetrated through to the mesh underneath.
Performance in Various Trail Conditions

I deliberately tested these in challenging Virginia weather – from 90°F humid summer days to 35°F muddy winter mornings. The breathability impressed me during hot weather. The mesh panels actually work, and my feet stayed reasonably comfortable even during sweaty climbs.
Water resistance is honestly described as “repellent” rather than “proof.” Light rain and dew? No problem. Stepping through shallow puddles? Your socks stay dry. But don’t expect these to handle stream crossings or extended wet conditions. I learned this lesson during a particularly muddy trail after heavy rain – my feet eventually got damp, but it took longer than I expected.
The aggressive outsole pattern does pick up mud and debris, which is expected. On the plus side, it releases easily with a stick or hose rinse.
Does Camel Crown Deliver on Their Promises?

Camel Crown markets these as “breathable non-slip sneakers lightweight low top for outdoor trailing trekking walking.” Let me break down their claims against reality:
Breathable: ✅ Confirmed. The mesh panels work well, and foot temperature stayed manageable during intense hikes.
Non-slip: ✅ Mostly confirmed. Excellent on most trail surfaces, good on wet rocks, adequate on slick surfaces.
Lightweight: ✅ Confirmed. At 12.4 oz, they’re genuinely light for this category.
Outdoor trailing/trekking: ✅ Confirmed. These handle day hikes and trail work admirably.
The “ankle support” claim needs context – as low-top shoes, they provide good lateral stability but obviously less ankle protection than mid or high-top boots.
My Overall Assessment
✅ Key Strengths
- Exceptional value at $65 price point
- Genuine comfort right out of box
- Excellent traction on varied terrain
- Lightweight without feeling flimsy
- Good breathability for mesh/leather combo
- Solid construction quality
- True to size for most users
- Comes with extra laces
❌ Areas for Improvement
- Stock laces are low quality
- Not truly waterproof
- Durability varies between users
- Some sizing inconsistency reported
- Outsole can wear faster than premium brands
- Limited color options
- Narrow toe box for wide feet
| Category | Score (1-10) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Comfort | 8.5 | Excellent out-of-box comfort, good all-day wear |
| Traction | 8.0 | Very good on most surfaces, adequate on wet terrain |
| Durability | 7.0 | Good but variable; depends on usage intensity |
| Breathability | 8.0 | Mesh panels work well for temperature control |
| Value | 9.0 | Outstanding performance per dollar spent |
| Build Quality | 7.5 | Solid construction with minor quality control issues |
| Style | 7.0 | Functional design, not fashion-forward but acceptable |
| Overall | 7.8 | Excellent budget option that punches above its weight |
What Other Trail Users Are Saying

The user feedback paints a clear picture: these shoes work exceptionally well for most people, but there are some consistency issues. Multiple users praise the comfort and value, with many saying they’ve bought multiple pairs. The common positives include immediate comfort, good traction, and impressive durability for the price.
However, there’s a pattern of quality control concerns. Some users received shoes that developed sole separation within 2-6 months, while others report 1-2 years of heavy use. The sizing also seems inconsistent between production runs – some batches run true to size, others run small.
Spanish-speaking customers consistently note the comfort (“muy cómodos”) and style (“muy cancheros”), though some mention concerns about wet-weather grip.
Value Assessment
At $65, these compete directly with shoes costing $120-150. Here’s the reality: you’re getting about 80% of the performance for 45% of the price. For casual hikers, weekend warriors, and anyone who doesn’t want to spend Merrell money, this is a compelling option.
The cost-per-use calculation works out well. Even if they last 12-18 months with regular use, you’re looking at roughly $3-5 per month for quality hiking footwear. Compare that to premium brands that might last longer but cost 2-3 times more.
Final Verdict

The Good
- Outstanding value proposition
- Immediate comfort and good fit
- Reliable traction on varied terrain
- Lightweight design
- Adequate durability for price point
The Not-So-Good
- Quality control inconsistencies
- Stock laces need replacement
- Not for serious technical hiking
- Water resistance is limited
Who Should Buy the Camel Crown Hiking Shoes?
Perfect for:
- Casual day hikers covering 1-10 miles
- Outdoor workers needing comfortable, grippy shoes
- Budget-conscious buyers who want hiking capability
- People transitioning from sneakers to trail shoes
- Anyone needing a backup pair for muddy/rough conditions
Skip if you:
- Need waterproof performance
- Hike technical terrain regularly
- Have very wide feet
- Want maximum durability regardless of cost
- Prefer premium brand backing/warranty
Better Options for Specific Needs
For waterproof needs: Merrell Moab 3 Waterproof (+$60 but genuinely waterproof)
For wide feet: Keen Targhee III (+$70 but wider toe box)
For maximum durability: Salomon X Ultra 4 (+$80 but bombproof construction)
For similar budget: Columbia Redmond V2 (similar price, less aggressive tread)
Final Recommendation
I’m giving the Camel Crown Men’s Hiking Shoes a solid recommendation with caveats. At $65, they deliver genuine value and performance that make them hard to beat for casual outdoor use. Replace the laces immediately, size up half if you’re between sizes, and don’t expect Merrell-level durability.
For the average recreational hiker or someone wanting capable outdoor shoes without the premium price tag, these are absolutely worth trying. Just go in with realistic expectations – you’re getting excellent budget performance, not premium quality at budget prices.
🛒 Ready to try them?
Frequently Asked Questions
Do these run true to size?
Mostly yes, but there’s some batch-to-batch variation. Most users find them true to size, but about 20% recommend sizing up half a size. If you’re between sizes, go larger.
How do they compare to Merrell shoes?
They offer about 80% of Merrell’s performance at 45% of the cost. Merrell wins on durability, brand support, and premium materials. Camel Crown wins on value and surprisingly comes close on comfort and initial quality.
Are they actually waterproof?
No, they’re water repellent, not waterproof. They’ll handle light rain and wet grass fine, but don’t expect them to keep your feet dry in puddles or streams.
How long do they typically last?
Varies significantly. Light users report 1-2 years, moderate hikers get 8-15 months, heavy users see 6-12 months. At this price point, that’s reasonable value.
Can I use these for running?
They work for light trail running, but they’re designed for hiking. The aggressive tread and stiffer construction make them less ideal for road running or fast trail running.
What about wide feet?
The toe box is on the narrow side. Several wide-footed users found them uncomfortable. If you have wide feet, consider sizing up a full size or looking at Keen alternatives.
Are replacement parts available?
No official replacement parts, but the removable insoles can be upgraded with aftermarket options. The laces should definitely be replaced with higher-quality alternatives.
Review Scoring Summary
| Overall Rating | 7.8/10 | Excellent Budget Option |
|---|---|---|
| Comfort Score | 8.5/10 | Outstanding immediate comfort |
| Performance Score | 8.0/10 | Solid trail capability |
| Value Score | 9.0/10 | Exceptional price-to-performance |
| Durability Score | 7.0/10 | Good but variable longevity |
| Style Score | 7.0/10 | Functional but not fashionable |
Bottom Line: The Camel Crown Men’s Hiking Shoes punch well above their $65 weight class, offering genuine trail capability and comfort that makes them an easy recommendation for budget-conscious hikers. While they won’t match premium brands for longevity or weather protection, they deliver outstanding value for casual outdoor use.
Get the best price on Amazon:
