OKAY, confession time – I’m obsessed with finding budget shoes that actually work. Mike here, and after burning through three pairs of cheap trail shoes in six months, I was genuinely curious about whether Saucony’s $45 Versafoam Excursion TR13 could deliver real value. That’s why I spent 6 weeks putting these through every test I could imagine – from hospital shifts to weekend trail walks. Here’s the unfiltered truth about what you actually get for your money.
Technical Specifications
- 💰 Price: $45-55 ()
- ⚖️ Weight: 10.8 oz (men’s size 9)
- 🧪 Midsole material: Versafoam cushioning
- 👟 Upper material: Trail-specific mesh with overlays
- 🏃♂️ Category: Budget trail/walking shoe
- 🎯 Best for: Light trail walking, daily wear, healthcare workers
- ⏱️ Testing period: 6 weeks, 140+ miles of walking, 25+ hours on feet
Design, Build Quality & Real-World Performance
After testing dozens of budget trail shoes, I’ve learned to manage expectations. The Versafoam Excursion TR13 immediately reminded me why Saucony has survived in the competitive footwear market – they understand the fundamentals of a comfortable shoe, even at this price point.
Upper Construction & First Impressions
The trail-specific mesh feels surprisingly breathable for a $45 shoe. During my first 4-mile walk around the neighborhood, I noticed my feet stayed relatively cool even on a 78-degree afternoon. The supportive overlays around the midfoot actually do provide some structure – not premium-level lockdown, but adequate for the intended use.
However, I need to address the elephant in the room – multiple users report a common failure point around the ankle collar. After examining several customer photos, it’s clear the fabric lining wears through relatively quickly with regular use. During my testing, I noticed some early signs of wear after about 80 miles, though not yet to the failure point.
Versafoam Cushioning Reality Check
Let me be straight about the cushioning situation. Saucony markets this as having “more comfort than ever before,” but after comparing it directly to my Brooks Ghost (admittedly 3x the price), the Versafoam feels thin. One reviewer aptly described it as “like running in sandals,” and that’s not far off.
During my hospital volunteer shifts (4-6 hours on concrete floors), the cushioning felt adequate for the first 2-3 hours, then my feet definitely started feeling the impact. For someone weighing 180 lbs, this shoe works best for activities under 3 hours or on softer surfaces like packed dirt trails.
On-the-Trail Performance
The triangular-lugged outsole genuinely impressed me on moderate terrain. Testing on local trails with loose gravel, packed dirt, and some rocky sections, the traction felt confident and secure. The lugs bite well into softer surfaces, and I never experienced any slipping on dry conditions.
However, the shoe shows its budget nature on wet surfaces or steep descents. The rubber compound feels adequate but not aggressive enough for challenging conditions. This is clearly designed for light trail walking rather than technical hiking.
Performance in Various Walking Conditions
Urban Walking & Daily Wear
For city sidewalks and daily errands, these shoes perform surprisingly well. The lightweight design (10.8 oz) makes them comfortable for extended wear, and the mesh breathability helps during warmer weather. Several healthcare workers in the reviews specifically mention using these for 10+ hour shifts, which speaks to their all-day wearability.
Light Trail Conditions
On well-maintained trails with moderate elevation changes, the TR13 handles itself respectably. The outsole provides adequate grip on packed dirt and gravel, and the upper protection keeps most debris out. However, I wouldn’t recommend these for technical terrain or serious hiking.
Weather Performance
One user reported good water resistance during bike rides through rain, noting only minimal dampening around the ankle area. However, the mesh upper isn’t waterproof, so expect wet feet in serious rain or puddles.
Does Saucony Deliver on Their Promises?
Marketing Claims vs Reality
Claim: “Versafoam cushioning for more comfort than ever before”
Reality: The cushioning is adequate for light activities but thin compared to serious running shoes. Better than basic sneakers, but not revolutionary.
Claim: “The triangular-lugged outsole grips the terrain for rock-solid footing”
Reality: Traction is genuinely good on moderate terrain. The lug pattern works well for its intended use – light trail walking and varied surfaces.
Claim: “Trail-specific mesh with supportive overlays locks your foot into place”
Reality: The lockdown is decent but not exceptional. Adequate for walking, but you’ll feel some foot movement during more dynamic activities.
The Durability Question
This is where the budget nature becomes most apparent. Multiple users report the ankle collar failing within 3-6 months of regular use. The sole separation issues some users experienced seem less common but still concerning for long-term reliability.
My Overall Assessment
Detailed Scoring
| Category | Score (1-10) | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Comfort | 6.5 | Good for light use, adequate cushioning |
| Durability | 5.0 | Common failure points, budget construction |
| Traction | 7.5 | Solid performance on intended terrain |
| Value | 7.0 | Decent performance for the price point |
| Breathability | 7.0 | Mesh upper works well in warm conditions |
| Fit | 6.5 | True to size, some width accommodation |
Overall Score: 6.3/10
What Other Trail Walkers Are Saying
The user feedback paints a consistent picture – these shoes work well for their intended purpose but have clear limitations:
Positive themes: Comfortable for walking, good value for money, lightweight, decent arch support, true to size for most users.
Negative themes: Durability concerns (especially ankle collar), thin cushioning for extended use, laces coming untied frequently, not suitable for serious running.
Value Assessment
At $45-55, you’re getting exactly what you pay for – a functional walking shoe with trail-appropriate traction. The cost-per-mile works out reasonably if you’re realistic about the lifespan (typically 6-12 months with regular use).
Final Verdict
✅ The Good
- Excellent value for budget-conscious buyers
- Lightweight and comfortable for daily wear
- Good traction on light trails and varied surfaces
- Breathable mesh upper
- True to size fit
- Adequate arch support for the price
❌ The Bad
- Durability issues, particularly ankle collar wear
- Thin cushioning not suitable for extended standing
- Laces tend to come untied frequently
- Not appropriate for serious running or technical hiking
- Quality control inconsistencies
Who Should Buy the Saucony Versafoam Excursion TR13?
✅ Perfect for:
- Budget-conscious walkers needing light trail capability
- Healthcare workers or service industry professionals on their feet 4-6 hours
- Casual weekend trail walkers on moderate terrain
- People needing a lightweight daily walking shoe
- Those who replace shoes frequently and want decent performance without premium price
❌ Skip if you need:
- Serious running shoe with substantial cushioning
- Long-term durability (12+ months regular use)
- Technical hiking capability
- All-day comfort for 8+ hour shifts
- Premium materials and construction quality
Better Options for Specific Needs
If the durability concerns worry you, consider spending $20-30 more for the Merrell Moab 3 or New Balance Fresh Foam X Hierro. For pure walking comfort, the Brooks Addiction Walker offers better cushioning at a higher price point.
Final Recommendation
The Saucony Versafoam Excursion TR13 delivers honest value for $45. It’s not trying to be something it’s not – this is a functional, lightweight walking shoe with light trail capability. If you understand the limitations and match your expectations to the price point, you’ll likely be satisfied with the performance.
At this price, I recommend buying them with realistic expectations about lifespan and use cases. They’re a solid choice for budget-conscious walkers who need decent traction and all-day wearability without premium shoe costs.
Get the best price on Amazon:
Frequently Asked Questions
How long do the Saucony Versafoam Excursion TR13 shoes typically last?
Based on user reports, expect 6-12 months with regular use. Healthcare workers using them for 10+ hour shifts report 3-6 months before needing replacement, while casual walkers often get 8-12 months. The ankle collar is typically the first failure point.
Are these shoes good for running?
Not recommended for serious running. While marketed as a “road running shoe,” the thin cushioning and budget construction make them better suited for walking and light jogging. Multiple users report discomfort during running activities.
Do they run true to size?
Most users report true to size fit, though some recommend going up a half size if you prefer a looser fit or plan to wear thick socks. The shoe accommodates medium to slightly wide feet reasonably well.
Can I use these for hiking?
Yes, for light hiking on well-maintained trails. The traction is adequate for moderate terrain, but don’t expect the durability or protection needed for technical hiking or backpacking.
What’s the deal with the laces coming untied?
Multiple users report laces that won’t stay tied, even with double knots. The lace material seems to have a slippery coating. Consider replacing the laces if this becomes problematic.
Are they waterproof?
No, the mesh upper is not waterproof. They offer some water resistance for light rain or splashing, but expect wet feet in serious rain or puddles.
How do they compare to other Saucony models?
Users consistently report that higher-end Saucony models like the Cohesion series offer better durability and cushioning. The Versafoam line represents Saucony’s budget offering with compromises in materials and construction.
What size should I order if I wear size 10 in Nike?
Most users find Saucony sizing consistent with Nike. Order your normal size, or go up a half size if you prefer a roomier fit or plan to use aftermarket insoles.
Review Scoring Summary
| Performance Category | Mike’s Score | Key Factors |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Comfort | 6.5/10 | Good for light use, thin cushioning limits extended wear |
| Durability & Build Quality | 5.0/10 | Common failure points, budget construction evident |
| Trail Performance | 7.0/10 | Good traction for intended use, adequate protection |
| Value for Money | 7.0/10 | Honest performance for the price point |
| Daily Wearability | 6.5/10 | Lightweight and breathable, sizing is consistent |
| FINAL SCORE | 6.3/10 | Solid budget option with clear limitations |