Last Tuesday, watching my buddy’s $200 Merrell hiking boots completely fall apart after 6 months, I started wondering if there was actually a budget option that could deliver decent performance without breaking the bank. Mike here, and after spending way too much on “premium” outdoor gear that didn’t last, I was skeptical but curious enough to spend 8 weeks putting the SHULOOK Waterproof Hiking Shoes through every real-world test I could imagine. At $45, here’s whether they can actually compete with the big names.

Technical Specifications
- 💰 Price: $45 ()
- ⚖️ Weight: 12 oz per shoe (men’s size 11)
- 🧪 Midsole material: EVA foam with memory foam insole
- 👟 Upper material: Suede leather and mesh with SL-TEX waterproof membrane
- 🥾 Sole material: Rubber with aggressive lug pattern
- 🏔️ Category: Budget waterproof hiking shoes
- 🎯 Best for: Day hikes, light trail use, wet weather walking
- ⏱️ Testing period: 8 weeks, 45+ hours of hiking, 120+ miles total
Design, Build Quality & Real-World Performance

Right out of the box, I’ll be straight with you – these don’t look like $45 hiking shoes. The suede and mesh upper combination actually feels substantial, and the stitching appears more precise than I expected. There’s a definite rubber smell initially (mentioned by multiple other testers), but leaving them outside for 48 hours took care of that completely.
The fit surprised me. At 175 lbs with slightly wide feet, I went with my normal size 11 and found them comfortable immediately. The toe box gives decent room without being sloppy, and the heel cup locks down well without pinching. The lacing system works as advertised, though like others mentioned, the laces are absurdly long – I cut mine down and sealed the ends with a lighter.

Support & Cushioning Experience
The memory foam insole provides solid initial comfort, though I noticed it compresses fairly quickly. After about 20 hours of hiking, I could feel it flattening out. The EVA midsole offers reasonable cushioning for a budget shoe – softer than old-school hiking boots but firmer than most running shoes. On rocky trail sections, I definitely felt more through the sole than with premium hiking shoes, but it wasn’t uncomfortable.
What impressed me was the ankle support design. Despite being a low-cut shoe, the heel counter and overall structure provide more stability than expected. During several stream crossings and uneven terrain sections, I felt confident and planted.

On-the-Trail Performance
Over 8 weeks, I tested these on everything from smooth park trails to rocky mountain paths. The traction genuinely surprised me – the aggressive lug pattern grips well on loose dirt, wet rocks, and muddy sections. I had zero slipping incidents, even on some sketchy stream rock crossings.
The waterproof membrane works as advertised, with one major caveat. During the first 6 weeks, my feet stayed completely dry through morning dew walks, light rain, and even a creek crossing where water went over the toe. However, around week 7, I started noticing dampness in my right foot during longer wet hikes.

Body response after 6+ hour hiking days was surprisingly good. My feet felt less fatigued than expected, though they definitely felt more worked than they would in my $180 Keens. The breathability is adequate – not amazing, but my feet didn’t turn into swamp conditions either.
Meeting Your Hiking Goals – Does It Deliver?
For budget-conscious hikers who need waterproof capability and decent trail performance, these deliver more than their price suggests. The traction is legitimately good, initial comfort is solid, and they handle day hikes without issue.
However, there’s a significant durability concern that every potential buyer needs to understand upfront.

Performance in Various Trail Conditions

Wet Weather Testing
I deliberately sought out challenging conditions to test the waterproof claims. Through morning dew on 3-mile grass trail sections, light rain during 4-hour hikes, and intentional puddle walking, the shoes performed well initially. The SL-TEX membrane kept water out effectively for the first 40+ hours of use.
The breathability balance is decent – they’re not as airy as mesh running shoes, but moisture management is better than fully sealed waterproof boots. During warmer weather hiking (75°F+), my feet stayed comfortable without excessive sweating.
Rocky and Technical Terrain
On loose rock sections and technical scrambles, the grip pattern excels. The rubber compound seems softer than premium brands, which provides good traction but raises durability questions. The toe protection held up well against repeated rock strikes.
The sole flexibility surprised me positively. Unlike stiff hiking boots, these bend naturally with foot movement while still providing structure. On steep descents, I felt secure and controlled.

Does SHULOOK Deliver on Their Promises?

Let’s fact-check the marketing claims against real-world experience:
“Ultra-light weight: 1.2lb” – VERIFIED. At 12 oz per shoe (1.5 lbs total), they’re lighter than claimed and definitely feel it on long hikes.
“Waterproof membrane prevents water” – MOSTLY TRUE with time limitations. Works effectively for 30-40 hours of use, then effectiveness varies by individual shoe.
“Advanced traction rubber sole” – ACCURATE. The grip pattern performs better than the price point suggests.
“Memory foam insole provides excellent arch support” – OVERSTATED. Provides decent initial comfort and basic arch support, but “excellent” is marketing hyperbole.
“Superior cushioning and high energy return” – PARTIALLY TRUE. Cushioning is adequate for the price, but energy return is minimal compared to modern running shoes.
The most concerning discrepancy is around durability. The marketing emphasizes “performance and durability,” but real-world testing reveals significant longevity issues.
My Overall Assessment

Detailed Performance Scoring
| Category | Score | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Comfort | 7.5/10 | Good initial comfort, decent for day hikes |
| Traction | 8.5/10 | Excellent grip pattern, confident on varied terrain |
| Waterproofing | 7.0/10 | Works well initially, effectiveness decreases over time |
| Durability | 5.5/10 | Major concern – sole separation issues common |
| Breathability | 6.5/10 | Adequate moisture management for waterproof shoe |
| Value | 7.5/10 | Good performance per dollar with durability caveat |
| Build Quality | 6.0/10 | Decent materials, questionable long-term construction |
What Other Hikers Are Saying
After analyzing hundreds of user reviews, clear patterns emerge. Positive feedback consistently mentions immediate comfort, good waterproofing initially, excellent traction, and outstanding value. Multiple testers praised performance that rivals much more expensive options.
However, the negative feedback reveals a critical pattern: sole separation from the upper after 3-8 months of regular use. This isn’t isolated – it’s a widespread quality control issue that affects a significant percentage of buyers. Some users report waterproofing failure concurrent with sole separation.
Spanish-speaking customers particularly noted “buena calidad con respecto al precio” (good quality for the price) while also documenting similar durability concerns.
Value Assessment
At $45, these shoes deliver impressive initial performance that genuinely competes with $100+ options. The comfort, traction, and initial waterproofing justify the price point. However, the durability issues create a complex value proposition.
If you calculate cost-per-use based on a 6-month lifespan with regular hiking, you’re looking at approximately $0.25-0.50 per hiking day. For casual hikers who hit trails 2-3 times per month, this could represent decent value despite durability concerns.

Final Verdict
The Good and The Bad
✅ STRENGTHS
- Excellent traction on varied terrain
- Good initial comfort and fit
- Effective waterproofing (short-term)
- Lightweight feel for hiking shoes
- Outstanding price-to-performance ratio
- True to size for most users
- Minimal break-in period required
❌ WEAKNESSES
- Significant durability concerns – sole separation
- Waterproofing effectiveness decreases over time
- Memory foam insole compresses quickly
- Strong rubber odor initially
- Laces excessively long out of box
- Limited long-term arch support
- Quality control inconsistencies
Who Should Buy the SHULOOK Waterproof Hiking Shoes?
PERFECT FOR:
- Budget-conscious hikers needing short-term waterproof performance
- Casual trail users (1-2 times per month)
- Backup/secondary hiking shoes
- Users wanting to test hiking before investing in premium gear
- Day hikers who replace shoes annually anyway
AVOID IF:
- You need shoes for intensive, regular hiking
- Long-term durability is a priority
- You prefer to buy gear once and use for years
- You have wide feet (some fit inconsistencies reported)
Better Options for Specific Needs
If durability is priority: Merrell Moab 3 Waterproof ($120) or Salomon X Ultra 3 GTX ($140)
If budget is critical: These remain the best waterproof option under $60
If you need ultralight: Altra Lone Peak 6 ($130, though not waterproof)
Final Recommendation
The SHULOOK Waterproof Hiking Shoes earn a solid 7.0/10 rating with important caveats. They deliver impressive performance that genuinely rivals shoes costing 2-3x more, but durability concerns prevent a higher score.
For casual hikers willing to replace shoes every 6-12 months, these represent exceptional value. The traction, initial comfort, and waterproofing make them legitimate hiking shoes, not just cheap alternatives.
However, serious hikers putting significant miles on their gear should invest in proven long-term options despite the higher upfront cost.
🛒 Get the best deal:
Bottom line: These shoes prove budget gear doesn’t have to mean poor performance, but understanding the durability trade-offs is essential for making the right buying decision.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do these shoes run true to size?
Based on my testing and user feedback analysis, they run true to size for about 80% of users. I recommend ordering your normal hiking shoe size. Some users with wider feet report needing a half-size up.
How long does the waterproofing actually last?
In my testing, full waterproof effectiveness lasted about 6 weeks of regular use (40+ hours). After that, performance becomes variable – some areas may start allowing moisture through, particularly around high-stress points.
Are these suitable for winter hiking?
For mild winter conditions and dry snow, yes. However, they lack insulation for sub-freezing temperatures and aren’t designed for ice/crampons. The traction works on packed snow but not ice.
How do they compare to Merrell or Salomon?
Initial performance is surprisingly comparable – traction and comfort match more expensive brands. The difference appears in longevity, materials quality, and consistent quality control. Premium brands typically last 2-3x longer.
Can I use these for everyday walking?
Absolutely. Many users report these work well for daily wear, dog walking, and urban hiking. The cushioning handles pavement and sidewalks comfortably.
What’s the return policy if I have durability issues?
Amazon’s standard return window applies (30 days). Some users report success contacting SHULOOK directly for warranty issues, though responses vary. .
Should I treat these with additional waterproofing spray?
Not necessary initially – the built-in membrane works well. However, after 4-6 weeks of use, a quality waterproofing treatment can help extend effectiveness.
Review Scoring Summary
| SHULOOK Men’s Waterproof Hiking Shoes – Final Scores | |
|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 7.0/10 |
| Comfort | 7.5/10 |
| Performance | 7.5/10 |
| Durability | 5.5/10 |
| Value | 7.5/10 |
| Build Quality | 6.0/10 |
| Recommendation | BUY (with durability expectations) |
Get the best price on Amazon:
